A review of the approved device history records indicated the lot met all release criteria.A lot history trending review was performed and there is one similar complaint reported for this lot number.The device was not returned to the manufacturer; therefore, an evaluation could not be performed.Based on the information provided, the root cause of this complaint cannot be determined.
|
It was reported that during the treatment of a splenic aneurysm with very tortuous vasculature, a 4fr glidecatheter 100cm was used to access.During positioning/placement of the embolization coil, the coil separated from the delivery pusher.The device was removed successfully without removing the glidecatheter.A new system was used to complete the case successfully.No patient injury was reported.
|