• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET MICROFIXATION HTR PMI RIGHT OCCIPITAL IMPLANT; HARD TISSUE REPLACE(HTR(R))-PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (PMI)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET MICROFIXATION HTR PMI RIGHT OCCIPITAL IMPLANT; HARD TISSUE REPLACE(HTR(R))-PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (PMI) Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/14/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Intraoperative fracture of the implant is a possible adverse effect listed in the package insert.No product will be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation as the first choice implant was discarded by the facility and the second choice implant remains implanted.Review of device history records show the lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported a pmma implant was too brittle and struggled to accept a screw.When the surgeon tried to plate the implant with 7mm screws the edges began to crumble and fall apart.The first choice implant and the broken pieces were removed and the back up implant was used to complete the craniotomy.This presented a delay of about fifteen to twenty minutes to the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint was that the implant was brittle and cracked during plating.The complaint could not be verified as the implant was not returned.The implant dimensional analysis scan performed on the fc (first choice) and bu (back up) implants as part of the finished part inspection process were reviewed.The scans determined that both the fc and bu implants were manufactured according to design requirements provided by the customer and met all acceptance requirements.Based on the data available through the review and investigation of this file, the most likely underlying cause is surgeon technique.The ifu (instructions for use) states ¿using a powered instrument, an appropriately sized pilot hole must be placed at least 4 mm from the perimeter of the implant before inserting any screw.Irrigation while drilling is recommended.¿ there are no indications of manufacturing defects.Date received by mfr, if follow-up, what type?, and evaluation codes were updated based on the completion of the investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HTR PMI RIGHT OCCIPITAL IMPLANT
Type of Device
HARD TISSUE REPLACE(HTR(R))-PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (PMI)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET MICROFIXATION
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville FL 32218
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET MICROFIXATION
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville FL 32218
Manufacturer Contact
michelle cole
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville, FL 32218
9047414400
MDR Report Key6073091
MDR Text Key58979902
Report Number0001032347-2016-00637
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KKY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK924935
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,health profession
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/08/2019
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberPM618478
Device Lot Number705760
Other Device ID NumberSEE H10 NARRATIVE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-