It was reported that the index procedure on (b)(6) 2016 was performed at (b)(6) hospital.The patient presented with st elevated myocardial infarction.A thrombotic occlusion was found in the mid right coronary artery (rca).Pre-dilatation was not performed.A 3.5 x 28 mm absorb gt1 scaffold was deployed and post-dilated with a 3.75 x 15 mm balloon up to 25 atmospheres (atm) and a 4.0 x 12 mm balloon up to 18 atm.Residual stenosis was less than 10%.Nine hours after the procedure the patient had ventricular fibrillation (vf) and cpr was performed.The patient was transferred to (b)(6) hospital where catheterization showed scaffold thrombosis and an urgent thrombectomy was performed.The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit and three days later suffered another episode of vf.Optical coherence tomography (oct) showed a broken scaffold strut; therefore, a xience stent was implanted.It was confirmed that the patient had been compliant with dual antiplatelet drug therapy (dapt).The patient remained hospitalized, but was discharged on (b)(6) 2016 with new york heart association (nyha) class 1 and left ventricular ejection fraction 45%.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.The reported patient effects of thrombosis and ventricular fibrillation, as listed in the absorb gt1 instructions for use (ifu), are known adverse events associated with the use of a coronary scaffold in native coronary arteries.It should be noted that the ifu states: pre-dilate the lesion to match the reference vessel diameter with a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheter.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported stent break and patient effects.
|