Updated: date received by mfr, type of reports, if follow-up, what type?, device evaluated by mfr?, evaluation codes, additional mfr narrative.(b)(4).The device was returned to the factory for evaluation.Signs of clinical use and no evidence of blood were observed.The delivery device was returned inside the loading device.There was no blood in or on the delivery tube.The slide lock was engaged and the plunger was not depressed on the delivery device.The seal and tension spring assembly remained inside the loading device.The seal was wrapped and only about 1/4 of the total length was inside the delivery tube indicating improper loading of the seal.The delivery device was removed from the loading device.The seal completely hung outside the delivery tube with the tension spring assembly, at 3/4 distance of the total length of the delivery tube, inside the tube.The outer edge of the seal was delaminated.The following measurements of the delivery tube were taken : the inner delivery tube diameter was measured at.198 inches , the outer diameter was measured at.220 inches.The length of the delivery tube was measured at 2.49 inches.The values recorded were within the tolerance specifications.Based upon the received condition of the device, the reported complaint was confirmed for reported failure "failure to load" and the analyzed failure "crack seal".Specific actions for the reported failure are being maintained and documented under maquet's corrective and preventive action (capa) system.
|