• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC X-REIDY BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION NEEDLE; MIJ NEEDLE, TUMOR LOCALIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC X-REIDY BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION NEEDLE; MIJ NEEDLE, TUMOR LOCALIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported during a procedure that one of the x-reidy breast localization wires broke off in the patient's breast.A mammography revealed approximately at 12mm tip of the wire retained in the patient's breast.Reportedly the surgeon will attempt retrieval after discussing with the patient.No other information was available at the time of this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Mij needle, tumor localization.Investigation results - clinical assessment: summary of the event: it was reported that "patient went to theatre about 2 weeks ago with 2 wires.The cancer has been safely excised with clear margins however during the operation one of the wires broke.This has resulted in the tip of the wire (approx.12mm on mammography) being retained in the breast.2mm tip of wire.Surgeon to attempt retrieval after discussion with patient ( yet to take place)".It was also reported that "a section of the device remained inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence".Clinical opinion of the event: based on the limited available information it is not clear if the leading cause to this event might be associated with a preexisting patient condition, the medical procedure or an eventual malfunction of the device.A request for more information and images was sent.This clinical review will be reassessed if more information will become available.A review of the device history record, documentation, drawings, manufacturing instructions, quality controls were conducted, as well as a visual inspection of the device in question.Manufacturing instructions discuss recommended techniques for grinding and shaping product.Refer to quality control specifications inspect all sections 100%, unless otherwise specified.Verify outside diameter and length of wire guide and hook.Inspection method: level i, measure outside diameter with micrometer or calipers.100% measure length with meter scale.Verify distance between distal solder joint and proximal ¿legs¿.Inspection method: measure with magnifying eyepiece.Verify solder joint is smooth, secure and has sufficient solder flow at distal end of wire guide and twist of dxr.Inspection method: slightly tug and feel solder joint.Visually examine with at least 7x magnification, must be free of cracks, sharpness and excessive buildup.Verify ¿legs¿ of dxr are free of foreign matter (discoloration from heat is acceptable).Inspection method: visually examine.Verify weld joint at proximal end of wire guide is smooth and mandrill wire is caught securely.Inspection method: slightly tug and feel weld joint, must be round and smooth.Coil should remain taut and not springy.Verify coil is clean and smooth without damage, outstanding coils or kinks.Inspection method: level i, visually examine and feel.Verify ¿legs¿ of dxr are as specified and not bent.Inspection method: visually examine.Verify ¿legs¿ of dxr are ground with oval bevels, facing outward from center of hook, free of burrs, nicks and grinding marks.Inspection method: visually examine with magnifying eyepiece and feel.4.10 verify cut leg does not protrude beyond outside diameter of twist and does not have excessive burrs.Inspection method: visually examine with magnifying eyepiece and feel.Verify ¿legs¿ of dxr are specified distance apart.Inspection method: visually examine.Measure with meter scale.Device failure analysis: a search of the design history file found 1 nonconformance for "434 - foreign matter" ; this is unrelated to the failure mode.There are no other complaints from this lot.The device was returned on 10nov2016 and 22nov2016.A detached portion of the wire with 'x' hook (dxr) attached was returned in used condition.It was covered in bio matter.The length of the dxr hook was in spec.The distance between the separated wires proximal end to the x-hook's proximal leg was 2mm.This coincides with the location of the junction with the cannula, per manufacturer's drawing.Thus, the x-hook broke at this junction.The junction is soldered per manufacturing instructions in quality control.Based on the location of the break, it is feasible to suggest that insufficient soldering, or manipulation/bending of the device at the junction, caused the hook section to separate.However, without more information a root cause cannot be determined between the two.There is no evidence to suggest that the device was not manufactured according to specification.Per risk assessment, no further risk reduction is required at this time.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints, and have notified the appropriate personnel of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
X-REIDY BREAST LESION LOCALIZATION NEEDLE
Type of Device
MIJ NEEDLE, TUMOR LOCALIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
rita harden
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key6075646
MDR Text Key59046676
Report Number1820334-2016-01259
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIJ
UDI-Device Identifier00827002193802
UDI-Public(01)00827002193802(17)210311(10)6806887
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/03/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberDXRBL-18-9.0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/10/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/11/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-