|
Catalog Number 324.210 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 10/13/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).The subject device has been received and is currently undergoing investigation.A device history record review has been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Synthes (b)(4) reported an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a percutaneous drill bit broke during surgery to treat an acetabular fracture on (b)(6) 2016.The surgeon started drilling the fractured area.When he was trying to feel the touch of the contralateral bone cortex, the drill mistakenly penetrated the contralateral skin.The drill bit reached the cover cloth and broke.There was no reported surgical delay.This report is 1 of 1 for com-(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device history records review was completed for part # 324.210, lot # 8878853.Manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: mar 12, 2014.No non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Corrected data: device available for evaluation? (other).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.No additional information has been received for these fields.The manufacturing evaluation results are as follows.Upon visual inspection of the complaint device it can be seen that the first 15 mm of the tip is broken off and twisted backwards.A device history record (dhr) review was performed for the affected lot, (b)(4) parts were delivered to the warehouse, no abnormalities or deviations were detected, which could lead to the complaint failure.The article was manufactured in march 2014.No ncrs were marked in the dhr during production.Moreover a review of our complaints data base shows, that there are no other complaints for this issue from this article and lot number.Because of the damage the relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|