Product evaluation: failure analysis for fiber (b)(4): the glass cap exhibits severe devitrification at output window; the metal cap exhibits moderate detritus adhesion on surface, and indications of slight melting on output window; the fiber is broken within the outer flow tubing at 2 inches from control knob, between distal tip and control knob, and exhibits indication of bending, crushed, and slight melting at break location; the fiber was tested with hene laser fixture, aim beam is present at break location; the outer flow tubing open end exhibits minor scratch marks, and mild contamination, likely biologic.Based on device analysis, the potential for forward firing may exist.Probable root cause: based on the device analysis, the probable root cause of the failure is: heat accumulation.Cap wear was accelerated due to anatomical/procedural factors (tissue contact and technique) encountered during the procedure which would limit the performance of the fiber.
|
It was reported that during a prostate procedure at 178,492 joules of use and 18 minutes, "fiber broke" was observed.It was further reported that there was a "breakage at insertion site of working element." the fiber tip (cap) was not cleaned during the procedure.The fiber was exchanged and the procedure was completed utilizing a second fiber.Patient's outcome "ok" reported.
|