BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE ELUVIA¿ DRUG-ELUTING VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number H74939295601510 |
Device Problems
Bent (1059); Fracture (1260); Difficult to Remove (1528); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation of Vessels (2135); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 10/12/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device is a combination product.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a vessel perforation, stent deployment issue and a stent fracture occurred.Vascular access was obtained using a contralateral approach.The highly calcified and moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the chronic total occluded superficial femoral artery.Following pre-dilation, a 6x150, 130cm eluvia¿ drug-eluting vascular stent system was advanced to the target lesion over a 0.035 guidewire.After approximately 1/3 of the stent was deployed, the stent deployment thumbwheel and pull grip did not work.The stent was attempted to be retrieved by pulling back with extreme difficulty.However, this led to the stent elongating and ultimately 3-4cm of the stent fracturing and remaining inside the patient.During the removal attempts, the patient experienced an arterial perforation.The perforation and fragmented stent piece were covered with three additional stents.No further complications were reported and the patient was discharged without significant complication.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of an eluvia stent delivery system (sds).The handle was separated as received.The shaft and handle were examined.There was a buckle at the nose cone.There was a kink in the inner shaft at the distal end of the middle shaft.The stent was not returned.The sds was in the deployed state, the inner was pulled out 150mm.The tip had impressions of the stent.The first distal tooth on the rack was damaged.The middle sheath was pulled out of the retainer clip.There was no evidence of any product quality deficiencies.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a vessel perforation, stent deployment issue and a stent fracture occurred.Vascular access was obtained using a contralateral approach.The highly calcified and moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the chronic total occluded superficial femoral artery.Following pre-dilation, a 6x150, 130cm eluvia¿ drug-eluting vascular stent system was advanced to the target lesion over a 0.035 guidewire.After approximately 1/3 of the stent was deployed, the stent deployment thumbwheel and pull grip did not work.The stent was attempted to be retrieved by pulling back with extreme difficulty.However, this led to the stent elongating and ultimately 3-4cm of the stent fracturing and remaining inside the patient.During the removal attempts, the patient experienced an arterial perforation.The perforation and fragmented stent piece were covered with three additional stents.No further complications were reported and the patient was discharged without significant complication.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|