ST. JUDE MEDICAL, COSTA RICA LTDA PRESSUREWIRE¿ X, WIRELESS, RX 175CM; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number C12059 |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/04/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Product evaluation: the results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Our investigation was limited to the review of the device history record, which showed that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and indicated complete in accordance with sjm specifications and procedures.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.The pressurewire x instructions for use (ifu) warns the user to observe all guidewire movements.Whenever the guidewire is moved or torqued, the tip movement should be examined under fluoroscopy.Never push, withdraw, or torque the guidewire if it meets resistance or without observing corresponding movement of the tip, otherwise vessel/ventricle trauma may occur.The pressurewire x instructions for use (ifu) warns the user that torquing or excessive manipulation of the guidewire in a sharp bend, against resistance, or repeated attempts to cross a total vessel occlusion may cause damage and/or fracture the guidewire.
|
|
Event Description
|
Post stent implant, ffr was performed using a pressurewire x wireless.When the pressurewire was pulled back, the tip of the wire remained in the vessel.No resistance was felt when pulling back or advancing the pressurewire.However, the physician alleged that the wire was pulled back with a non-sjm guide catheter and that he was not sure if resistance would have been felt.The physician alleged that the wire had been pulled back and then re-advanced under a stent strut, and that there was a large chunk of calcium that created a problem for a number of stents and balloons.The tip of the wire was stented against the vessel wall.The patient is stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Ffr measurement was performed using a pressurewire x wireless.The lesion was found to be significant.Once it was determined that the lesion would be treated, several balloons and stents were placed over the pressurewire.When the pressurewire was pulled back, the tip of the wire remained in the vessel.No resistance was felt when pulling back or advancing the pressurewire.However, the physician alleged that the wire was pulled back with a non-sjm guide catheter and that he was not sure if resistance would have been felt.The physician alleged that the wire had been pulled back and then re-advanced under a stent strut, and that there was a large chunk of calcium that created a problem for a number of stents and balloons.The tip of the wire was stented against the vessel wall.The patient is stable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|