• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN SPIDER FX; DEVICE, CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT, TEMPORARY, FOR EMBOLIZATION PROTEC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN SPIDER FX; DEVICE, CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT, TEMPORARY, FOR EMBOLIZATION PROTEC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK-PLY-SPIDER
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Thrombus (2101)
Event Date 04/01/2006
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Clinical research - coronary interventions eurointervention 2014;10:689-693 estimate of date study began.It went on until dec 2011.Cine image review: ten images from the procedure were published in the article.In the images, it can be seen that the spiderfx filter was being advanced in a vessel without the spiderfx catheter.Thrombus emboli and its removal can also be seen in the images.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Background: during a study, the physician attempted to use a spider embolic protection device to capture and remove a large non-occlusive coronary thrombus from a number of patients, if required.The general protocol used was - a 6f or 7f guide catheter was used.Target vessel was greater than or equal to 3 mm.Aspiration with a medtronic aspiration catheter was attempted in all cases.If this was unsuccessful, a second coronary wire was advanced across the lesion.A spider device was then advanced over one of the wires into the distal vessel and its basket opened.The size of device was chosen to be one size larger than the distal reference vessel diameter.Following successful capture of the thrombus, the retrieval catheter was used to close the neck of the basket and the device was removed.If residual thrombus was present, the spider device was reintroduced and the withdrawal procedure repeated.The patient identified as case 8 in the study was diagnosed with non-st segment elevation myocardial infarction(nstemi).It is reported this patient had a substantial thrombus burden at the right coronary artery(rca) and required passage of the filter device three times for complete removal of the thrombus.Following the final passage of the spider device, a small thrombus embolised to a sub-branch of the posterior left ventricular branch.This small occlusive embolic thrombus was completely removed using a medtronic aspiration device.The lesion was then stented over with no evidence of further embolisation.No further patient complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPIDER FX
Type of Device
DEVICE, CORONARY SAPHENOUS VEIN BYPASS GRAFT, TEMPORARY, FOR EMBOLIZATION PROTEC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
091708734
MDR Report Key6102163
MDR Text Key59867212
Report Number2183870-2016-00664
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NFA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K063785
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/15/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-PLY-SPIDER
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age42 YR
-
-