• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37602
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 02/28/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d11: product id 37602, lot# serial#(b)(4), implanted: 2016 (b)(6) explanted: product type implantable neurostimulator.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a health care provider (hcp) via a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for obsessive compulsive disorder (ocd) and movement disorders.It was reported that there were high impedance unipolar values greater than 2,000 ohms and bipolar values greater than 4,000 ohms; an open circuit on contact #0 was reported.It was confirmed that impedances were normal following an implantable neurostimulator (ins) replacement surgery in (b)(6) 2016.It was also reported that the patient was not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit from the device as there was a gradual return of ocd symptoms for the last 9 months.No troubleshooting could be performed due to a lack of access to the product.It was later reported that the patient experienced an unspecified sensation at the ins site.High impedance values greater than 40,000 ohms were reported on contact 0.The rep stated that during programming they received a charge density warning "at above 6.5v, 150 pw, 745 ohms".The hcp is planning on conducting an exploratory surgery due to the impedance issue.It was later reported that the rep met with the patient and reprogrammed them from c+,0-,1- to c+,1- and increased the pulse width from 120 to 150.An x-ray was also performed that confirmed that no physical damage was present.A possible revision of the lead and extension was discussed as no causality could be determined for the return of symptoms and the impedance issues; the issue was still ongoing.Please see report number 3004209178-2016-24266.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available as of the date of this report.A follow-up report will be submitted when analysis is complete.(b)(4).A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was later reported that both of the patient's inss were replaced due to normal battery depletion.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) found no significant anomalies.Analysis determined that the output and telemetry were acceptable; however, the battery is near normal battery depletion.Due to the reported complaint, an impedance test was performed in 0.9% saline solution and good impedances were observed using an n'vision clinician programmer.A lab functional test determined there was good stable output on the electrode pairs the ins had when it was received.A lab functional test determined there was good stable output on all electrode pairs.Analysis determined there were no issues when pressing on the ins can.Analysis determined the telemetry was acceptable.The information obtained from the ins upon receipt indicated the device had reached eri (elective replacement indicator).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6110119
MDR Text Key60240518
Report Number3004209178-2016-24268
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MFR
UDI-Device Identifier00613994761057
UDI-Public00613994761057
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H050003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/02/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/14/2018
Device Model Number37602
Device Catalogue Number37602
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/05/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
-
-