• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® BIVONA® CUSTOM HYPERFLEX¿ TRACHEOSTOMY TUBES; TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® BIVONA® CUSTOM HYPERFLEX¿ TRACHEOSTOMY TUBES; TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HU16AS40NGE047N
Device Problems Break (1069); Out-Of-Box Failure (2311); Split (2537); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem Irritation (1941)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device is currently being evaluated; the manufacturer will file a follow-up report detailing the results of the evaluation once it is completed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a portex bivona custom hyperflex tracheostomy tube was found broken and split at the flange where the tracheostomy tube tie would attach, upon opening the box.The event occurred in the patient's home with the patient's mother, grandmother, nurse, or registered respiratory therapist present.It was noted that the flange was made of a more slippery silicone.The tracheostomy tube was changed daily and new tubes were exchanged in every 6 months.The patient had to be taken to a pediatric otolaryngologist as the patient was without a proper tracheostomy tube for an unknown amount of time, and was switching with a step-down tracheostomy tube.The patient was treated with antibiotics for two weeks due to irritation from the tracheostomy tube changes.The irritation was resolved once new tracheostomy tubes were received.No permanent injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
One 4.0mm customized tracheostomy tube was returned for investigation.A review of the device history record, relevant to the reported lot, found that the device passed qa inspection prior to shipment.Visual inspection of the device revealed that both flange eyelets were torn completely through.Further inspection of the torn eyelets, found that the tears appeared to be caused by a sharp object.According to the initial reporter's description of the event, velcro neck ties were used to secure the tracheostomy tube during patient use.Per the device instructions for use (dfu), velcro tracheostomy tube holders may have sharp edges which can come into contact with the eyelets and compromise the product integrity.The device instructions for use recommend using the provided twill tape to secure the tracheostomy tube.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PORTEX® BIVONA® CUSTOM HYPERFLEX¿ TRACHEOSTOMY TUBES
Type of Device
TUBE TRACHEOSTOMY AND TUBE CUFF
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD INC
5700 west 23rd avenue
gary IN 46406
Manufacturer Contact
lisa perz
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis, MN 55442
7633833074
MDR Report Key6120408
MDR Text Key60651398
Report Number3012307300-2016-00399
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JOH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K923878
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,distributor,health p
Reporter Occupation Respiratory Therapist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/22/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Patient Family Member or Friend
Device Expiration Date02/05/2021
Device Catalogue NumberHU16AS40NGE047N
Device Lot NumberGS020945
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/05/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight37
-
-