• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 DR-T; ICD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 DR-T; ICD Back to Search Results
Model Number 360346
Device Problem Programming Issue (3014)
Patient Problem Tachycardia (2095)
Event Date 10/23/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Ous mdr - it was reported that approximately 65 months after the implantation the patient was admitted to emergency room with a pacing rate 150 in atrium and ventricle.The problem was resolved through device reprogramming.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The icd was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore based on the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device as well as on the returned device data.The manufacturing process for this device was re-investigated.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process which might be related to the clinical observation.The returned device data have been analyzed.A paced rhythm at the upper tracking rate that was programmed to 150 bpm was confirmed on the screenshot available for analysis.Furthermore an av- delay significantly shorter than 200 ms was noted.In a next step a similar demo device was bench tested in the laboratory and exhaustive attempts to reproduce the failure condition were undertaken.Under normal and expected operating conditions it was not possible to reproduce the clinical observation.However, due to the observed shortened av delay below the programmed parameters, an inconsistent memory content was deliberately introduced in the memory area storing the executed av-delay in the laboratory.In combination with the programmed parameters, particularly upper tracking interval, the post ventricular atrial refractory period, a rate at the maximum sensor rate and a certain sequence of sensed events in both channels, the device delivered a pacing sequence that matched the clinical observation, limited by the programmed upper tracking rate.In conclusion, a definite root cause determination was not possible.Under normal device operation the failure condition was not reproducible despite exhaustive attempts.Only after deliberate introduction of an inconsistent memory content in the laboratory, the device behavior was reproducible under certain constraints.Due to the reproducibility of the clinical observation it is reasonable to assume that the root cause is an inconsistent memory content in the memory area of the executed av delay in combination with the programmed therapy parameters as well as intrinsic rhythm (av-delay, msr, utr, pvarp, etc.).Based on the reproducibility a repetition of the clinical event is highly unlikely, however, cannot be excluded as a definite root cause determination was not possible based on the available data.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 540 DR-T
Type of Device
ICD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key6120863
MDR Text Key60684576
Report Number1028232-2016-04671
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/22/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number360346
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/08/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-