Udi: (b)(4).(b)(6).The reporter¿s complete address was not provided.This device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that the burr device was stuck inside the motor device.During the pre-repair diagnostics assessment, it was determined that the temperature was above specification, the device became hot, and the hose was damaged and was too loud.It was further determined that the cover was missing.It was further determined that the device failed for handpiece temperature assessment, air pump assessment, cutter lock assessment, loctite and cable assessments, noise assessment and for safety assessment.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|