• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 21342
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer in colombia reported a misidentification of streptococcus agalactiae as streptococcus thoraltensis in association with the vitek 2 gp test kit.The customer reported the streptococcus agalactiae was confirmed by sample type, macroscopic features and biochemical series.The customer reported there was a delay in reporting the incorrect results.There is no indication or report from the customer to biomérieux that the discrepant result led to any adverse event related to a patient's state of health.It was noted that during the last service visit, the pre-analytical phase was revised, except for the culture media which are prepared by the customer, and greater deviation was found in the assembly process.Users claim that misidentification errors have occurred with multiple users since the last visit and that prior use of the same methodology did not produce errors.The vitek 2 instrument was newly installed in (b)(6) 2016.An internal investigation has been initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation was conducted for a misidentification of streptococcus agalactiae as streptococcus thoraltensis in association with the vitek® 2 gp test kit.Information showed the customer was having identification issues with multiple species.Troubleshooting indicated that the customer prepared their own media, their saline may have been contaminated, and they did not test isolates at the appropriate age of culture.After a visit from a field service engineer to check the instrument, card set up, and review procedure, the identification issues ceased.Two lab reports were submitted for review.One lab report showed an acceptable identification of streptococcus thoraltensis.There were seven (7) atypical positive reactions (amy, draf, cdex, dxyl, dsor, dman, pul) for an identification of streptococcus thoraltensis.There were 5 atypical positive reactions (amy, draf, dxyl, dsor, pul) for an identification of streptococcus agalactiae according to the gp knowledge base.A review of quality records confirmed gp lot 242398140 met final release criteria and there were no issues with initial performance testing.An increased number of atypical positive reactions can indicate contamination, mixed culture, use of non-recommended media or other user set up errors or an atypical strain.However without the strain, or raw data it's not possible to further evaluate the cause of the misidentification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK® 2 GP TEST KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
hazelwood MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
hazelwood MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
ellen weltmer
595 anglum
hazelwood, MO 63042
3147317301
MDR Report Key6138434
MDR Text Key61245543
Report Number1950204-2016-00192
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K952095
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/01/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Expiration Date01/09/2018
Device Catalogue Number21342
Device Lot Number2420044103
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/10/2016
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-