• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102R
Device Problems Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 11/03/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by the physician that the patient was referred for generator replacement and possible lead revision with a new strain relief loop because the device had "fallen." it was reported through the neurologist's clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2016 that the patient's device slid down to the top of her left breast when she lifted her hands to fix her hair.Because of this, the device was reportedly now aggravating her.It was also noted that the physician was unable to interrogate her device which lead the physician to believe that the device was possibly no longer working.The patient's primary physician reported through clinic notes dated (b)(6) 2016 that the patient needed corrective surgery for her "broken" vns implant.He reported that the patient was having a seizure every 30 minutes that morning.Based on a battery life calculation on (b)(6) 2016, the patient has 0 years remaining until expected neos=yes, which indicates battery depletion.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was referred for surgery for generator replacement and to revise generator placement.There was reportedly no trauma to cause the migration.The doctor reported that he believed the patient couldn't be interrogated due to end of service and that the patient was experiencing increased seizures attributed to loss of therapy.After the device migrated, it was also difficult to find.The patient reportedly could no longer feel stimulation after the migration occurred.With regards to the patient's strain relief loop, there was not a concern of a serious injury; it was reported that they want to confirm that the migration didn't affect the lead's strain relief.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The surgeon who initially implanted the patient's generator reported that he did not know whether he used a nonabsorbable suture to secure the generator to the fascia at time of implant.Per a received implant card, patient underwent a full revision of generator and lead surgery due to battery depletion and high impedance, which is captured in mfr.Report # 1644487-2017-03027.Follow up with the attending company representative reported that the patient's generator had migrated behind the patient's breast and could be moved 4-5 inches around.The patient reportedly could feel it moving every time she got up.The company representative was not able to interrogate the patient's generator either in or out of the body.He noted that the patient believed her generator had been dead for over a year and it hadn't been interrogated for over a year.No additional relevant information has been received to date.No product has been received to date.
 
Event Description
The patient's lead was returned and product analysis was completed on the device.Three fractures were identified, which are captured in mfr.Report # 1644487-2017-03027, but there was no obvious evidence to whether migration contributed to the one or more of the fractures.However, the suspect cause of the fractures was identified as due to wear, which suggests that the lead fractures were present prior to migration.The suspect product has not been returned to date.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
The suspect product was received for analysis.Product analysis was completed on the explanted generator and confirmed end of service, no communication condition.Post-burn electrical testing found that the generator performed according to functional specifications.No anomalies were identified.No further relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102R
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6143151
MDR Text Key61401188
Report Number1644487-2016-02759
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/02/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/15/2009
Device Model Number102R
Device Lot Number017112
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/29/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/10/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
-
-