• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: VERTIFLEX, INC. SUPERION INTERSPINOUS SPACER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

VERTIFLEX, INC. SUPERION INTERSPINOUS SPACER Back to Search Results
Model Number 100-0108
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 11/10/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Case report provided by manufacturer's clinical specialist, who was observing the procedure, suggests spinous processes were grossly misaligned.This is potentially an indication of a degree of scoliosis (>10 degrees) which, if it were the case, would be contraindicated.Further, initial attempts by the user to deploy the implant failed because of obstruction by bony anatomy (likely l4 spinous process).Under such circumstances, users are instructed to close (undeploy) the implant and reposition it such that it is clear of the bony obstruction prior to re-deploying it.The user instead attempted to drive the implant ventrally with a mallet in an attempt to force deployment.This, too, failed, and the user continued to try to force deployment despite the bony obstruction, which resulted in failure of an implant component.This is the first report of this type of event ever received.Device remains in situ.
 
Event Description
Pt.Was undergoing an l4/l5 implantation for relief of symptoms secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.Severe abnormal alignment/scoliosis of l4 and l5 spinous processes was observed, which inhibited proper deployment (opening) of the implant.The physician felt he could partially deploy the implant, and then drive it ventrally against the lamina, which would fully deploy the device.He proceed to impact the partially deployed implant ventrally against the lamina with an orthopedic mallet in an attempt to complete deployment of the implant and seat it more fully.This, despite clinical specialist's caution against doing so.The attempt was unsuccessful, as the implant was prevented from deploying fully by obstruction from the misaligned l4 spinous process.Despite the l4 spinous process obstructing the implant, the physician continued to attempt to force implant deployment, at which time the right superior portion of the cam lobe broke off the implant.When asked by the clinical specialist if he'd like to remove the broken implant and try a new device, the physician chose to leave the broken implant in the patient, as he believed it restored the segmental height where it was.Device remains in situ.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERION INTERSPINOUS SPACER
Type of Device
INTERSPINOUS SPACER
Manufacturer (Section D)
VERTIFLEX, INC.
1351 calle avanzado
san clemente CA 92673
Manufacturer (Section G)
VERTIFLEX, INC.
1351 calle avanzado
san clemente CA 92673
Manufacturer Contact
robert reitzler
1351 calle avanzado
san clemente, CA 92673
9499401434
MDR Report Key6146090
MDR Text Key61733008
Report Number3005882106-2016-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/05/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/01/2020
Device Model Number100-0108
Device Catalogue Number100-9808
Device Lot Number081274R1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient Weight77
-
-