|
Model Number 100-0108 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/10/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Case report provided by manufacturer's clinical specialist, who was observing the procedure, suggests spinous processes were grossly misaligned.This is potentially an indication of a degree of scoliosis (>10 degrees) which, if it were the case, would be contraindicated.Further, initial attempts by the user to deploy the implant failed because of obstruction by bony anatomy (likely l4 spinous process).Under such circumstances, users are instructed to close (undeploy) the implant and reposition it such that it is clear of the bony obstruction prior to re-deploying it.The user instead attempted to drive the implant ventrally with a mallet in an attempt to force deployment.This, too, failed, and the user continued to try to force deployment despite the bony obstruction, which resulted in failure of an implant component.This is the first report of this type of event ever received.Device remains in situ.
|
|
Event Description
|
Pt.Was undergoing an l4/l5 implantation for relief of symptoms secondary to lumbar spinal stenosis.Severe abnormal alignment/scoliosis of l4 and l5 spinous processes was observed, which inhibited proper deployment (opening) of the implant.The physician felt he could partially deploy the implant, and then drive it ventrally against the lamina, which would fully deploy the device.He proceed to impact the partially deployed implant ventrally against the lamina with an orthopedic mallet in an attempt to complete deployment of the implant and seat it more fully.This, despite clinical specialist's caution against doing so.The attempt was unsuccessful, as the implant was prevented from deploying fully by obstruction from the misaligned l4 spinous process.Despite the l4 spinous process obstructing the implant, the physician continued to attempt to force implant deployment, at which time the right superior portion of the cam lobe broke off the implant.When asked by the clinical specialist if he'd like to remove the broken implant and try a new device, the physician chose to leave the broken implant in the patient, as he believed it restored the segmental height where it was.Device remains in situ.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|