• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. VERSA-KATH CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC. VERSA-KATH CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number A-EP-042
Device Problems Difficult To Position (1467); Difficult to Remove (1528); Retraction Problem (1536); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
On november 4, 2016, epimed received a call from (b)(6), reporting an incident involving a sheared versa-kath catheter.A 7cm fragment of the catheter was returned to epimed on november 9, 2016.The catheter fragment was closely examined under the ce-180 (ram optical measurement system).It appeared that the catheter had been cut by an external force; however, epimed determined this to be inconclusive based on the visual evidence alone.On november 11, 2016, epimed's qa analyst emailed susan ussery with additional questions regarding the initial reported complaint.According to the physician, while performing a cervical pain procedure, some resistance was experienced while inserting the catheter.He stated that he was using a caudal approach, and was attempting to position the catheter using the fluoroscope, but was experiencing difficulty.He stated that he attempted to withdraw the catheter, but met resistance.He withdrew the needle, and then the catheter, and that is when he noticed the defect.Although a patient was involved at the time of the reported incident, no adverse events or harm occurred during the procedure.The sheared catheter fragment was removed from the patient in its entirety, and the procedure was eventually completed successfully with a new catheter and a new rx coude needle.Epimed suspects that end-user error caused the shear to the versa-kath catheter.In response to epimed's questions regarding the reported complaint, the physician stated that he attempted to withdraw the catheter first, but met resistance.Epimed warns against this within their ifu pi-004 rev.3.Epimed believes if the ifu was followed, it may have prevented the damage to the catheter in question.Epimed also electronically reviewed 5 years of previous complaint history, but did not find any complaints involving a fully sheared versa-kath catheter.Epimed believes this was an isolated incident and a failure of the end-user to properly follow the device ifu.
 
Event Description
On november 4, 2016, epimed's quality assurance manager received a call from (b)(6), medical lab technician, at (b)(6), reporting that, "while the doctor was inserting the catheter, the catheter broke in half.The doctor was able to remove the piece of the catheter from the patient.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSA-KATH CATHETER
Type of Device
VERSA-KATH CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer (Section G)
EPIMED INTERNATIONAL INC.
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown NY 12095
Manufacturer Contact
kris knapp
141 sal landrio drive
johnstown, NY 12095
5187250209
MDR Report Key6151135
MDR Text Key61707287
Report Number1316297-2016-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K023140
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2020
Device Model NumberA-EP-042
Device Catalogue Number181-2112
Device Lot Number31127262
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/28/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
Patient Weight89
-
-