• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ENC453712
Device Problem Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/08/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x/17293464).(b)(4).It is anticipated that the device will be returned for analysis; however, the device has not yet been returned.Lake region medical reviewed the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of the above mentioned lot.The device history record review also included a review of the certificate of conformance received from specialty coatings systems and nitinol devices and components, along with lake region medical¿s internal receiving inspection records for the stents issued to the complaint lot.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.This is 1 of 2 mdr reports being submitted for this complaint, with associated report numbers of 3008264254-2016-00087 and 1226348-2016-00183.
 
Event Description
As reported by a healthcare professional, during the stent assisted coil embolization of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm, the enterprise stent (enc453712/ 10602078) could not be advanced via the prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x/ 17293464).They withdrew the coil with microcatheter and used new products to complete the procedure.There had been a continuous flush through the microcatheter.Neither the prowler nor the enterprise appeared damaged after removal.The devices had been prepped and used as per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no report of patient injury or significant delay in the procedure.It was reported that the products would be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for analysis on 12/15/2016.Conclusion: as reported by a healthcare professional, during the stent assisted coil embolization of the posterior communicating artery aneurysm, the enterprise stent (enc453712/ 10602078) could not be advanced via the prowler select plus microcatheter (606s255x/ 17293464).They withdrew the coil with microcatheter and used new products to complete the procedure.There had been a continuous flush through the microcatheter.Neither the prowler nor the enterprise appeared damaged after removal.The devices had been prepped and used as per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no report of patient injury or significant delay in the procedure.It was reported that the products would be returned for analysis.A non-sterile enterprise device was received inside of a plastic bag.The delivery wire was inspected and it was found without any damage.The introducer tube was received separated of the delivery wire and no damages were noted on it.The functional analysis could not be performed through the microcatheter received since the stent was received deployed and it is necessary that the stent is still inside of the introducer tube to perform the functional analysis.(b)(4)reviewed the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of this complaint involved lot # 10602078.The device history record review also included a review of the certificate of conformance received from specialty coatings systems and nitinol devices and components, along with (b)(4) internal receiving inspection records for the stents issued to the complaint lot.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at (b)(4) and was determined to be acceptable.The enterprise resistance within the microcatheter could not be confirmed since the event could not be evaluated due to the stent being received deployed.The device did not present any obvious indication of manufacturing defect or anomaly that could contributed to the event as reported.Neither the product analysis nor the dhr review suggests that the failure could be related to the enterprise manufacturing process.No corrective action will be taken at this time.This is 1 of 2 mdr reports being submitted for this complaint, with associated report numbers of 3008264254-2016-00087 and 1226348-2016-00183.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
karen anigbo
325 paramount dr
raynham, MA 02767
5088288374
MDR Report Key6151221
MDR Text Key61872417
Report Number1226348-2016-00183
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
H60001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2017
Device Catalogue NumberENC453712
Device Lot Number10602078
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
-
-