• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GIVEN GILA (LOS. ANGELES) MANOSCAN ESO Z CATHETER; SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTIONAL MOTILITY(ELECTRICAL)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GIVEN GILA (LOS. ANGELES) MANOSCAN ESO Z CATHETER; SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTIONAL MOTILITY(ELECTRICAL) Back to Search Results
Model Number 3890
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/31/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The patient required unintended radiation exposure.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, the esophageal manometry probe was placed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Manometry study was conducted without incident.Upon removal of the esophageal manometry probe, the probe was stuck and unable to be removed.Several attempts were made to dislodge the probe.The doctor was notified and assessed the patient.The doctor tried to remove the probe, but was unsuccessful.Doctor spoke with the doctor who placed the manometry probe during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.The patient was brought to radiology for chest x-ray to assess probe placement.The doctors from ears, nose, and throat (ent) came to assess probe placement in gi clinic.The doctor from ent was also unable to remove probe while in the clinic.The patient was brought up to ent clinic where the probe was removed successfully.The patient suffered a small nose bleed which was noted and stopped by the time the patient left the clinic.After the procedure, it was determined the patient had an anatomical abnormality that may have contributed to the probe being stuck.Patient safety did follow up with risk management at the hospital for how the probe was removed and additional information could not be provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the device was returned for evaluation, and a device history review showed that it was released meeting finished product specification.It was noted following the procedure that the issue was caused by an anatomical anomaly in the patient, though the customer stated that no specific details were available regarding the abnormality.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MANOSCAN ESO Z CATHETER
Type of Device
SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTIONAL MOTILITY(ELECTRICAL)
Manufacturer (Section D)
GIVEN GILA (LOS. ANGELES)
5860 uplander way
culver city CA 90230
Manufacturer (Section G)
GIVEN GILA (LOS. ANGELES)
5860 uplander way
culver city CA 90230
Manufacturer Contact
amy beeman
5920 longbow drive
boulder, CO 80301
7632104064
MDR Report Key6154279
MDR Text Key61718946
Report Number3005344223-2016-00005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FFX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K091070
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number3890
Device Catalogue Number3890
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/29/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-