A customer in (b)(6) notified biomérieux of a misidentification of a serratia marcescens urinary sample in association with vitek® ms instrument (udi (b)(4)), which did not provide the identification.An investigation was performed.The ecal mzml and sample mzml files, and the analyzer fine tuning report were reviewed.The data indicated the fine tuning of the system needed to be checked and the mains fine tuning criteria were outside the targets.Fine tuning was performed and the customer retested the isolate (b)(6) 2016 and vitek ms identified the expected result of serratia marscesens.Further review of the ecal mzml and sample mzml files, showed the number of peaks of ecal spectra varies between 52 and 126 peaks which traduces a spectra variability most likely caused by spot preparation variability.This is also confirmed when we compared spectra from the sample for the initial tests (number of peaks: 136 and 151) and the repeat test (number of peaks: 33).The user performed 2 different spots on the same run and received a no identification result with the error message, "sample spot: too many peaks." in this situation, according to the vitek® ms workflow user manual, the user should "repeat the acquisition for the same deposit.If the message is displayed again, redo the deposit and then the acquisition.If the message recurs, call biomérieux technical assistance or your local biomérieux representative." there is no information on the customer performing other tests with the specimen.The investigation concluded that the system performed as expected, as it provided the no identification with an error message.In this situation, the user has to repeat the deposit, which was eventually done after fine tuning and the expected result (serratia marcescens) was obtained.The first no identification result was most likely caused by a bad deposit that could not be identified by the vitek® ms system.
|