• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problems Malposition of Device (2616); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Corneal Abrasion (1789); Corneal Edema (1791); Visual Impairment (2138); Loss of Vision (2139)
Event Date 11/10/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This mdr is being filed for the first corneal inlay device that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted on (b)(6) 2016.Reference mdr # 3005956347-2016-00009 for the second inlay device that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted on (b)(6) 2016.The device history record (dhr) for this manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.The explanted inlay was not returned to the manufacturer so physical product investigation could not be performed.(b)(4).Date emdr submitted to fda: 12/09/2016.
 
Event Description
During the surgery to implant the raindrop corneal inlay, the corneal flap folded during the attempt to close the flap.The patient had edema after the surgery.At the one-day postoperatively examination, the raindrop corneal inlay was found to be decentered inferiorly.The flap was lifted and the inlay was removed and replaced with a new inlay.Four days later, the inlay was found to be decentered again and it was removed and replaced with a new inlay.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
[correction] the raindrop inlay (serial number: (b)(4)) was implanted and removed the same say as it was moving around and corneal flap was not holding the inlay in place.This smdr is being filed for the 1st corneal inlay device that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted the same day.Reference mdr # 3005956347-2016-00009 for the 2nd raindrop corneal inlay that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted on (b)(6) 2016.Reference mdr # 3005956347-2017-00011 for the 3rd raindrop corneal inlay that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted on (b)(6) 2016.Reference mdr # 3005956347-2017-00012 for the 4th raindrop corneal inlay that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and explanted on (b)(6) 2016.Complaint reference number: (b)(4).Date esmdr submitted to fda: 01/18/2017.
 
Event Description
A raindrop corneal inlay was implanted in the patient's left eye on (b)(6) 2016 and removed the same day as the inlay was moving around.After this implantation, three raindrop inlays have been implanted and removed due to inlay decentration and corneal flap not holding inlay in place.The third inlay was implanted on (b)(6) 2016 and replaced with a new raindrop inlay on (b)(6) 2016.The fourth inlay was found to be decentered at the one-day postoperative visit and subsequently explanted on (b)(6) 2016.The patient's preoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) in the operative eye was 20/20.Prior to intervention, bcdva decreased to 20/300.After intervention, the patient's bcdva improved to 20/30.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Patient follow-up was requested from the surgeon, who provided the following additional information.The patient was last examined on (b)(6) 2017.During this exam, the patient complained of decreased distance vision in comparison to preoperative distance vision.The patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) has returned to baseline (20/20).Trace epithelial ingrowth was observed, cornea was clear with minimal debris but no haze.Corneal topography showed irregular astigmatism which was not a preexisting condition for this patient.The patient was recommended to use artificial tears a couple of times a day.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6160389
MDR Text Key62084072
Report Number3005956347-2016-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013(17)190822(10)002984
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/09/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/22/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Catalogue NumberRD1-1
Device Lot Number002984
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
-
-