• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO COLONOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE PENTAX; VIDEO COLONOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number EC-3490LI
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 10/19/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Since event information was received after the device repair, the device will not be returned.
 
Event Description
Pentax medical was made aware of a report for an event which occurred in (b)(6) stating while pentax model ec-3890li/serial (b)(4) was being used for a procedure, the bending rubber section split apart leaving black debris in the patient's colon.The colonoscope was withdrawn and the procedure was completed using another endoscope.Pentax (b)(4) submitted a report to (b)(6)(b)(4) stating "endoscope was sent in for repair with the comment of separation of sheathing exposing metal and nothing was mentioned on the document that this incident happened during the procedure.After we completed the repair and the sent the endoscope back to the customer we were notified that this incident (separation of sheathing) did happen during the procedure.We did ask the customer about the details of the incident and their feedback was the following "scope was being used for procedure, bending rubber section split apart leaving black debris in patient's colon.Scope was withdrawn & procedure was completed using another scope.No patient consequences as per the hospital."" in addition, the report stated, "the scope did come in for repair on oct 24th, 2016.It was repaired and shipped out on nov 11th.The customer didn't communicate to us that this incident happened during the procedure until nov 14th, 2016 therefore no additional investigation was done during the repair process.We are currently doing an investigation with the customer." pentax medical contacted the customer with regards to any medical intervention used on the patient.The customer stated the second scope was used to evacuate as much of the debris as possible.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Pentax (b)(4) submitted a final report to health (b)(4) on (b)(6) 2017 (reporter file no.(b)(4)).In the report, pentax (b)(4) stated "we have tried obtaining additional information from the customer on the chemicals that are being utilized to clean and disinfect the endoscopes and whether these chemicals have been validated by the manufacturer to clean the endoscopes however no response was received despite sending 3 e-mails asking for the information.Therefore the root cause of the problem could not be determined.As no additional information was available from the customer, no corrective action is planned at this time.If additional information is provided, the complaint investigation will be reopened.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENTAX
Type of Device
VIDEO COLONOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi
tokyo, 196-0 012
JA  196-0012
Manufacturer (Section G)
HOYA CORPORATION PENTAX TOKYO OFFICE
tsutsujigaoka 1-1-110
akishima-shi
tokyo, 196-0 012
JA   196-0012
Manufacturer Contact
krishna govindarajan
3 paragon drive
montvale, NJ 07645
8004315880
MDR Report Key6173914
MDR Text Key62361964
Report Number9610877-2016-00176
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K131855
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/17/2017,11/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/14/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberEC-3490LI
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA02/17/2017
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/14/2016
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer02/17/2017
Date Manufacturer Received01/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-