• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/02/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Assigned udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Information was received from the surgeon's representative.The patient had their old lead removed and a new lead implanted on (b)(6) 2016.The caller then noted that the new lead was not working with the patient's generator, so the patient's generator was replaced.It is unclear how the lead was not working with the generator.Additional information from the surgeon was received via fax stating that the generator was a "faulted generator".The explanted generator and lead were received on 12/09/2016.Analysis is underway, but hasn't been completed to date.Attempts at additional information have been made, but no additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event or problem, corrected data: reference mfr report # 1644487-2016-02612 reports the allegation on the lead.Previous initial mdr inadvertently did not include the reference mfr report # for the allegation on the lead.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Per company representative who was at the explant surgery, system diagnostic and interrogation were performed on the generator at the explant surgery which found the high lead impedance.However, no troubleshooting was performed.Decoder data from the tablet used during the explant surgery shows that the generator was only interrogated and programmed.No system diagnostics were documented to have occurred at the time of explant for this generator.As the system diagnostic test was not performed, the previously stored high impedance was not cleared.Per review of device history records , no unresolved non conformances were found on the generator and the device passed all functional and electrical testing.Analysis was performed on the returned generator.The allegation of high impedance was not confirmed.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.The allegation of high impedance on the lead was previously reported in mfr report # 1644487-2016-02612.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6180909
MDR Text Key62924244
Report Number1644487-2016-02891
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/16/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/22/2018
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number4827
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received01/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age28 YR
-
-