• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND XIA 3 TITANIUM BLOCKER; PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND XIA 3 TITANIUM BLOCKER; PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 48230000
Device Problems Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384); Failure to Align (2522); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Injury (2348)
Event Date 10/14/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that; on (b)(6) 2016, dr.Operated to replace the defective hardware and used triple-lock screw caps to secure the new hardware.My son continued to have constant pain and mobility problems.Further ct scans revealed the double-lock screw caps, from the (b)(6) surgery, at l4-s1 had failed.This hardware failure caused the screws to back out of place and the hardware to fall out of alignment.In addition, some of these screws were holding a rod in place.Without the screws holding it in place, the rod was literally banging around the base of the spine.On (b)(6) 2016, dr.Replaced all the defective hardware, replaced the rod which was now damaged, and used the triple-lock screw caps to hold everything in place.These two surgeries caused the patient extreme pain, all because of hardware failures.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Risk assessment; device history, device evaluation and complaint history review could not be performed as no lot code was provided and the product was not returned.The exact root cause could not be determined because the devices were not returned for evaluation.
 
Event Description
It was reported that; on (b)(6) 2016, dr.Operated to replace the defective hardware and used triple-lock screw caps to secure the new hardware.My son continued to have constant pain and mobility problems.Further ct scans revealed the double-lock screw caps, from the december surgery, at l4-s1 had failed.This hardware failure caused the screws to back out of place and the hardware to fall out of alignment.In addition, some of these screws were holding a rod in place.Without the screws holding it in place, the rod was literally banging around the base of the spine.On (b)(6) 2016, dr.Replaced all the defective hardware, replaced the rod which was now damaged, and used the triple-lock screw caps to hold everything in place.These two surgeries caused the patient extreme pain, all because of hardware failures.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XIA 3 TITANIUM BLOCKER
Type of Device
PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND
le crêt-du-locle 10 a
-
la chaux-de-fonds 2300
CH  2300
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER SPINE-SWITZERLAND
le crêt-du-locle 10 a
-
la chaux-de-fonds 2300
CH   2300
Manufacturer Contact
christa marrow
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key6186839
MDR Text Key63193220
Report Number3005525032-2016-00161
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNI
UDI-Device Identifier04546540560193
UDI-Public(01)04546540560193
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113666
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/13/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/19/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue Number48230000
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
-
-