Follow up #1 device was manufactured august 2016 and lot consists of (b)(4) units.Device in question sold to customer on 21sep2016.Inspection of the device found sheath was bent and contained a dent approximately 65mm from distal end.Inside of the device, at the dent location, broken glass lens was found.Moisture also entered the optical system resulting in picture deterioration.In our opinion, damage to sheath was due to mechanical overload.A product or manufacturing problem is not recognizable.The instructions for use (ifu) contains multiple visual and functional checks in order to identify issues early.Leaks that appear in optics system show up in the form of image deterioration and are usually found during instrument processing, and device should not be placed in use.In addition, the product must be inspected immediately before and after use for damage, loose and/or missing parts.The risk assessment, a1 r04, was reviewed and rated with an acceptable risk.This rating is still valid considering the current case.Richard wolf (b)(4) considers this matter closed.However, in the event richard wolf (b)(4) receives any additional information a follow up report will be submitted to fda.Richard wolf medical instruments corporation (rwmic) submitting report on behalf of richard wolf (b)(4).
|