• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97712
Device Problem High impedance (1291)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Information references the main component of the system.Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A manufacturing representative (rep) reported they were doing a brand new implant with a lead.There were no extensions and when they hooked up the lead implantable neurostimulator (ins) they had high impedance.They removed the lead an wiped it off and reconnected and tested at a higher voltage, but the obtained similar results.Then they tested in the mltc and both sides were fine.They opened a new ins and got similar high impedance.With the 1st ins, 4,5 were fine, but everything else on 0-7 were high.They noted 8-15 were normal and now 3 was fine, but everything else 0-7 was out.During troubleshooting the rep swapped lead tails into opposite ports on the 2nd ins and ran impedance at 3v.They indicated the lead that had been having issues was okay in the 8-15 port, and only contact 3 was over 40,000ohms.The rep then swapped lead tails into opposite ports on the 1st ins and again, the issue seemed to follow the lead as 0-7 port was fine and contact 15 on 8-15 was out.They tried the mltc again and everything tested fine.There was not visible damage to the leads.The rep indicated they would be implanting the 2nd ins.The issue occurred intra-operation and there were no symptoms reported.Follow up information from the rep stated the lead was positioned with the tip in the right gutter and the proximal end of the lead midline and they thought it anatomical.They stated that the system was working fine and the patient was getting good coverage.All impedances were 1500-1600 as of the report on (b)(6) 2016.The ins was indicated for spinal pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the ins ((b)(4)) found no evidence of anomalies.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6215848
MDR Text Key63691011
Report Number3004209178-2016-27472
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109506
UDI-Public00643169109506
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/14/2017
Device Model Number97712
Device Catalogue Number97712
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/29/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/30/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
12/29/2016
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/23/2017
09/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
-
-