• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A. HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE; SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82-3113
Device Problem Decrease in Pressure (1490)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 12/08/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation a follow up report will be filed.
 
Event Description
A chpv valve was implanted in 2009 by the clinician at (b)(6) hospital.Patient has had an arachnoid cyst and had an mri and the valve moved from its setting of 100 to 60.The surgeon and resident tried to reprogram the patient in clinic but were unable to move it.She came to the er on (b)(6) 2016 where they tried again under fluoroscopy but it was unsuccessful.The valve was explanted today (b)(6) 2016 and they implanted another valve (medtronic).No adverse, device will be returned.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Upon completion of the investigation it was noted that the images were taken of the ¿as received¿ valve.The position of the cam when valve was received was 30mmh2o.The valve was visually inspected: no defects were noted.The valve was hydrated for 24 hours.The valve was tested for programming with programmer 82-3126 with serial number (b)(4) and programmer 82-3190 with serial number (b)(4), the valve failed the test, the cam mechanism did not move during the programming process.The valve was flushed, the valve passed the test no occlusion was noted.The valve was leak tested, no leaks were noted.The valve was reflux tested, the valve passed the test.The valve was dried.The valve was then pressure tested at 30mmh2o, the valve passed the test.The valve was dismantled and was examined under microscope at appropriate magnification: biological debris was found on the spring, on the spring pillar, on the cam mechanism, and on the base plate.The cam magnets were also controlled.The magnets failed.The polarity of the magnets was tested, the magnets were all on ( - ) failed.Review of the history device records confirmed the valve product code 82-3113 with lot cnhbz3, conformed to the specifications when released to stock in 12th december 2007.The root cause of the problem reported by the customer was due to abnormal polarization of chpv magnets this abnormal polarization was probably caused by magnetic fields, this however could not be confirmed.The chpv knockdown evaluation test was documented through dra.Based on the results of this investigation no further action is required.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HAKIM PROGRAMMABLE VALVE
Type of Device
SHUNT, CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM & COMPS
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. / MEDOS S.A.
rue girardet 29 case postale
le locle
SZ 
Manufacturer Contact
james kenney
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088282726
MDR Report Key6218383
MDR Text Key63730720
Report Number1226348-2017-10005
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JXG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K980778
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/03/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2012
Device Catalogue Number82-3113
Device Lot NumberCHNBZ3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/24/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 MO
-
-