• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GE OEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS (SLC) 9800; FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GE OEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS (SLC) 9800; FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Loss of Data (2903)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/08/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A ge service representative performed an onsite investigation.The cine hard disk drive was evaluated and replaced.The system was tested and found to be working as intended and returned to service.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the system failed to properly save and recall patient image data.No patient serious injury or death was reported related to this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
9800
Type of Device
FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
GE OEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS (SLC)
384 wright brothers drive
salt lake city UT
Manufacturer Contact
384 wright brothers drive
salt lake city, UT 
MDR Report Key6220400
MDR Text Key63800631
Report Number1720753-2017-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/03/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/1970
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-