• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK FEMORAL-LM-RL-SZ 3; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK FEMORAL-LM-RL-SZ 3; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180503
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Discomfort (2330); Injury (2348); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 12/07/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental report will be submitted if additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Revision of mako left medial knee.Femoral component was loose although not grossly.Abnormal wear on the tibial insert.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding loosening involving a mck femoral-rm-ll-sz 3 was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: the parts were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.A material analysis was performed and indicated "nothing remarkable was observed on the femoral component.Burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the articulating surface of the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." -medical records received and evaluation: not performed as medical records were not received for review with a clinical consultant.-device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.-complaint history review: there has been no other event for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the event could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined because insufficient medical information was provided.A material analysis was performed and indicated "nothing remarkable was observed on the femoral component.Burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the articulating surface of the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined." if additional information are received, this investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated.
 
Event Description
Revision of mako left medial knee.Femoral component was loose although not grossly.Abnormal wear on the tibial insert.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK FEMORAL-LM-RL-SZ 3
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
keyla colon
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6225577
MDR Text Key63957231
Report Number0002249697-2017-00084
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/02/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number180503
Device Lot Number390708-M
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
-
-