Patient weight is unknown.Event date: unknown.Udi: (b)(4).Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Manufacturing location: (b)(6).Manufacturing date: august 05, 2015.Expiry date: july 01, 2020.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Investigation summary: the given information on the device report has indicated that there was a re-intervention to remove the zipfix.The complained devices were not returned; therefore, we cannot give a conclusive statement regarding the possible failure reason.Unfortunately, we have received only limited information.Neither further details, nor surgery report was forwarded.Both batches were produced according to the specifications.There is no allegation of device defect, deficiency or surgical technique error associated with this complaint.As there is no device malfunction alleged and no associated surgical technique error.Dhr reopened because the supplier was missing.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: dhr review for: part: 08.501.001.01s / lot: 9512981; manufacturing location: (b)(4); supplier: (b)(4); manufacturing date: 05.Aug.2015, expiry date: 01.July 2020.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|