• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problems Contamination (1120); Labelling, Instructions for Use or Training Problem (1318)
Patient Problems Irritation (1941); Loss of Vision (2139); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/07/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record for this manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.The explanted inlay was discarded by the facility and is not available for evaluation.Please reference the medication alert for durezol.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient underwent implantation of the raindrop corneal inlay in the left eye on (b)(6) 2016.During surgery, durezol was instilled on the stromal bed.At the slit-lamp examination immediately following implantation (day 0), the interface was not clear and debris of unknown origin was observed.The patient was monitored and the interface debris did not progress, but did not improve.The interface debris was suspected to be residual durezol.On (b)(6) 2016, the inlay was explanted and the interface was copiously irrigated with balanced salt solution (bss) then durezol was placed on the stromal bed, followed by copious irrigation with bss and a new raindrop inlay was implanted.Additional information is being requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Reference mdr# 3005956347-2017-00021 for the replacement inlay.
 
Event Description
On january 21, 2017, additional information was received and it was learned that excessive patient movement during the initial surgery on (b)(6) 2016 resulted in an epithelial defect.As reported in mdr# 3005956347-2017-00021, this same patient had a similar adverse event with the second raindrop inlay that was implanted on (b)(6) 2016.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6252053
MDR Text Key64885297
Report Number3005956347-2017-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013(17)190822(10)002984
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/13/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/22/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Lot Number002984
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction Number3005956347-02/03/17-001
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
DUREZOL; FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-