• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY; MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZFEN-P-2-24-94-R
Device Problems Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 12/28/2016
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Event Description
Patient presented to the facility due to symptoms of back pain.A ct scan was performed and an endoleak (believed to be type iii) was found in the graft where the devices overlap.An angiogram was performed to determine there was a leak/tear between the overlap.A cut down was then performed on right groin and an additional graft was placed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was implanted in 2013 and the graft remains in situ, therefore the device was not returned for evaluation.Upon reviewing the photos taken of the complaint device during manufacture, it appeared that the endovascular graft was manufactured as per specifications.The work order record for ac922978 was reviewed and appeared complete and correct.The instructions for use supplied with the complaint device state: "the long-term performance of fenestrated endovascular grafts, including the stents placed in fenestrations/scallops, has not yet been established.All patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires life-long, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms, changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft, or stenosis/occlusion of vessels accommodated by fenestrations) should receive enhanced follow-up." "after endovascular graft placement, patients should be regularly monitored for perigraft flow, aneurysm growth, patency of vessels accommodated by a fenestration/scallop, or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft.At a minimum, annual imaging is recommended, including: 1) abdominal radiographs to examine device integrity (separation between components, stent fracture or barb separation) and 2) contrast and non-contrast ct to examine aneurysm changes, perigraft flow, patency, tortuosity and progressive disease.If renal complications or other factors preclude the use of image contrast media, abdominal radiographs and duplex ultrasound may provide similar information." "potential adverse events that may occur and/or require intervention include, but are not limited to: endoleak, and endoprosthesis (improper component placement; incomplete component deployment; component migration; suture break; occlusion; infection; stent fracture; graft material wear; dilatation; erosion; puncture; perigraft flow; barb separation and corrosion)." "repeat angiogram to verify: ¿ the degree of overlap with proximal body (no less than 2 stents) ¿ the position of the contralateral limb ¿ the position of the ipsilateral iliac limb with respect to the common iliac bifurcation." and "reposition distal bifurcated body as required." the imaging received was reviewed by the medical director (md): "i agree that there was a type iii endoleak at the junction of the proximal and distal grafts, shown on the ct and the angio still frames.This appears to be where there is a marked anterior curvature of the grafts, causing the distal component of the graft to insert into the proximal portion at an angle.This is best seen on the lateral view ct.The leak is confirmed on the subsequent angiogram still frames.The subsequent secondary intervention, to place an additional stent graft across the leaking junction appears to have been successful, with cessation of the type iii endoleak.I note that there is no report of patient death, so a satisfactory secondary intervention was performed.My opinion is that the endoleak was not caused by any inherent failure of the implanted devices, but rather by the marked anterior curvature of the devices.This is usually the result of patient height decrease secondary to osteoporosis of the vertebral column and its associated crush/wedge fractures.The state of the patient¿s spine can¿t be seen or assessed on the original still frame angiograms from 2013, as they were all taken as ap views and subtraction was applied.However, on the lateral view ct scans from (b)(6) 2016, the vertebral column looks markedly degenerated, and this may have caused some height loss in the patient, with subsequent ¿buckling¿ forward of the previously-placed endograft." based on the information present, a definitive root cause of the complaint could not be identified.It is possible that one or more of the following factors could have contributed to the complaint: - graft sizing, - graft migration, - patient-related factors.It is possible that patient-related factors contributed to the complaint as per the md's evaluation, which stated that the type iii endoleak was caused by the "marked anterior curvature of the devices.This is usually the result of patient height decrease secondary to osteoporosis of the vertebral column and its associated crush/wedge fractures." there is no evidence that a device nonconformance or deficiency contributed to the complaint.
 
Event Description
Patient presented to the facility due to symptoms of back pain.A ct scan was performed and an endoleak (believed to be type iii) was found in the graft where the devices overlap.An angiogram was performed to determine there was a leak/tear between the overlap.A cut down was then performed on right groin and an additional graft was placed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZENITH FENESTRATED AAA ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT PROXIMAL BODY
Type of Device
MIH SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM A. COOK AUSTRALIA, PTY LTD
95 brandl street
eight mile plains
brisbane QLD 4 113
AS  QLD 4113
Manufacturer Contact
nicolas bidaud
95 brandl street
eight mile plains
brisbane, qld 4113
AU   4113
738411188
MDR Report Key6255127
MDR Text Key64922105
Report Number9680654-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020018
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/16/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberZFEN-P-2-24-94-R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/03/2017
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ZENITH DISTAL BIFURCATED BODY ZFEN-D-12-28-76-C
Patient Age89 YR
-
-