• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937)
Event Date 10/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: the product was returned for analysis.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.Results from the product history record review indicated the product met release criteria.There have been no other complaints reported in the lot number.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
An ophthalmic surgeon reported that five months following a glaucoma filtration device (gfd) implant procedure, it was suspected that the device was clogged.Also at the same time, part of the device started to expose out of the sclera to the conjunctiva.Since the patient's intraocular pressure (iop) was increasing, clogged shunt was suspected.Subsequently, another surgery was performed seven months following the initial procedure to remove the gfd and implant a glaucoma valve.Additional information was requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product evaluation: sample was returned for investigation, including only the shunt and without other identification means.Unknown material was seen on the shunt's body and through the port opening and the shunt lumen was found blocked.Therefore, the reported complaint was confirmed.From previous experience the material blocking the device cannot be identified due to two main reasons: the sample is sterilized using gamma radiation which damages the material characteristics.The size of the device does not allow extraction of the material from within its lumen.After cleaning and cutting the shunt, openings on both sides of the restriction unit were seen and no welding penetrations were seen; therefore, there is no indication for manufacturing related factors that could cause the blockage.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to the manufacturer's release criteria.During production, 100% final inspection is being performed on the entire batch, including visual inspection and inner illumination.If a blockage would be noticed, the product would have been rejected immediately.Having said that, one may conclude that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause is inconclusive ¿ no root cause identified, as the blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during and after the clinical procedure.Since openings were seen on both sides of the restriction unit and no welding penetration were seen, there is no evidence for an inherent defect that might have caused the event.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
rita lopez
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175514846
MDR Report Key6258340
MDR Text Key65026453
Report Number3003701944-2017-00017
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/17/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2019
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number60053
Device Lot Number072621
Other Device ID Number00380650705013
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/20/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age85 YR
-
-