• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS D-DIMER; FIBRIN SPLIT PRODUCTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS D-DIMER; FIBRIN SPLIT PRODUCTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04912551190
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 12/06/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).(b)(4).The full facility name was provided as(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer stated that they received erroneous results for two samples from the same patient tested for d-di tina-quant d-dimer gen.2 (ddi) on two different cobas 6000 c (501) module - c501 analyzers.Erroneous results were reported outside of the laboratory.The first sample was initially tested on the c501 a analyzer, resulting as 757 ug feu/l.Three hours later, a second sample was collected from the patient and tested on the c501 a analyzer, resulting as 162 ug feu/l.The physician asked for repeat testing to be performed.Both samples were repeated on a second c501 (c501 b) analyzer, with the first sample resulting as 357 ug feu/l and the second sample resulting as 118 ug feu/l.Both samples were then repeated on both systems.When tested on the c501 a analyzer, the first sample resulted as 464 ug feu/l and the second sample resulted as 119 ug feu/l.When tested on the c501 b analyzer, the first sample resulted as 357 ug feu/l and the second sample resulted as 118 ug feu/l.On (b)(6) 2016, precision testing was performed and then both samples were repeated again on both systems.When tested on the c501 a analyzer, the first sample resulted as 779 ug feu/l and the second sample resulted as 134 ug feu/l.When tested on the c501 b analyzer, the first sample resulted as 729 ug feu/l and the second sample resulted as 152 ug feu/l.The patient was not adversely affected.The serial numbers of the c501 analyzers were requested but not provided.A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.Additional information required for the investigation was requested, but not provided.No sample from the patient was available for investigation.Calibration traces for the first c501 analyzer showed frequent calibration failures.Maintenance was up to date, controls were ok, no alarm messages were issued, and precision testing was ok.Assuming that maintenance, hardware, and handling of materials were ok, the issue may have been caused by unique sample characteristics, including gel particulates, fibrin, foam, clots, oil droplets, as well as interfering factors within the sample.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
D-DIMER
Type of Device
FIBRIN SPLIT PRODUCTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6263223
MDR Text Key65246772
Report Number1823260-2017-00107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GHH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
K062203
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04912551190
Device Lot Number152134
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/03/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-