On (b)(6) 2016 the patient ecogs were reviewed and square signals were observed on channels 1 and 2 (sn (b)(4)) additional testing of the lead impedances revealed insufficient charge and irregularity in the lead signal.Based on troubleshooting it was believed that the irregular signal was a result of a lead break.There was no indication of signal issue with the right lead at that time.The left lead detection and therapy were disabled.On (b)(6) 2016 the patient returned for follow up.It was noted that the left depth lead issues continued and impedances/ecog signals were abnormal.It was brought to dr.(b)(6) attention that on ~(b)(6) 2016 there was artifact seen on the right depth lead (sn (b)(4)) as well and impedance checks revealed that there was 'insufficient charge' on contact rhip4.Dr.(b)(6) counseled the patient on replacing both leads as she felt the troubleshooting indicated both leads were possibly fractured.On (b)(6) 2016- during the surgical case, after exposing the device, the left and right depth leads were removed from their original ports and placed in the opposite ports.(left depth=port2 / right depth=port1) impedances and ecog signals were then checked and it was verified that the abnormal impedances and artifactual signals followed the lead swap.This confirmed the issue was with the leads and not the ipg itself.Both leads were then explanted and sent to pathology.New leads were implanted and all impedances were wnl(within normal limits).Ecog signals were appropriate per dr.(b)(6).Leads will not be returned for investigation they were both stretched/damaged during the explant process.
|