Catalog Number 1000462HJ |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 01/11/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a mildly tortuous unspecified lesion.A balance heavyweight (bhw) guide wire was being advanced to the lesion using a radial access; however, when the guide wire got to the shoulder there was resistance and could not advance any further.An unspecified catheter was then advanced over the guide wire and it also met resistance so the devices were removed as a single unit.Outside the anatomy it was noted that the tip of the guide wire had separated and remained in the anatomy.The tip was removed by a surgical procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.The patient is doing well.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary:the device was returned for analysis.Visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The separation was confirmed.The failure to advance and difficult to position could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The hi torque guide wires instructions for use states: all hi-torque guide wires are intended to facilitate the placement of balloon dilatation catheters during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta).There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to filing the initial mdr, the following additional information was provided: the bmw guide wire was used for an off-label indication.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was returned for analysis.Visual and dimensional inspections were performed on the returned device.The separation was confirmed.The failure to advance and difficult to position could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to filing the final mdr, the following information was received: the physician did not use the stent off-label, it was just radial access.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|