• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problems Biological Environmental Factor (2887); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Corneal Edema (1791); Blurred Vision (2137); Loss of Vision (2139)
Event Date 12/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record for this manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.The explanted corneal inlay has not been returned to the manufacturer at this time.Inlay shifts in position, inlay removal, and decreased visual acuity are listed in the device labeling as known adverse events.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The raindrop corneal inlay was implanted in the patient's left eye on (b)(6) 2016.At the one-week postoperative visit, meigbomian gland debris was observed under the flap and the inlay was found to have decentered >1 mm inferiorly.On (b)(6) 2017, the inlay was removed, the interface was irrigated and a new raindrop corneal inlay was implanted.The patient's preoperative best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) was 20/20 in the operative eye.Postoperatively prior to inlay exchange, the patient's bcdva decreased to 20/50.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Age corrected to from (b)(6) to (b)(6) years.Device manufacture date corrected from 09/13/2019 to 09/13/2016.The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The findings revealed that the inlay had some cuts and tears which is consistent with findings for corneal inlays that have been explanted.The edge thickness and diameter were measured and found to be within specifications.The patient's anatomy is the likely cause of inlay decentration.(b)(4).Reference mdr# 3005956347-2017-00025, for the replacement inlay.
 
Event Description
An adverse event occurred with the replacement raindrop corneal inlay that was implanted in the patient's left eye on (b)(6) 2017.Reference mdr# 3005956347-2017-00025 which was filed for the replacement inlay for this same patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6298942
MDR Text Key66427578
Report Number3005956347-2017-00013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013(17)190913(10)002990
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/02/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/13/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Lot Number002990
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/13/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-