Returned for evaluation was one pmta accu2i intermediate applicator.A visual examination of the device noted that the tip of the applicator is bent and the device has been cut at the tubing below the handle.The site of the break/bend occurs where the tip meets the shaft of the device.This tip did not fully detach from the shaft.Functional testing could not be performed due to the condition of the returned device.The customer's reported complaint description of the tip bend/ fracture is confirmed.Although the reported complaint description is confirmed, a definitive root cause cannot be determined.As the evaluation of the device determined the tip did not fracture off inside of the patient, the patient suffered no adverse effects due to this event.A review of the device history records was performed for the reported packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Based on the device history review this event does not appear to be due to a manufacturing defect.A possible contributing factor could have been operational context; i.E.Probe placement into hard tissue or lateral forces on the applicator tip during placement or removal.The ifu states; "avoid placing lateral forces on the applicator tip during placement or removal and lateral forces on the applicator tip should be avoided both during insertion and removal.Failure to do so could result in damage to the microwave array, failure of the applicator and injury to the patient." a review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.(b)(4).
|