• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS VORTEX CT PORT ACCESS SYSTEM; SMARTPORT CT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS VORTEX CT PORT ACCESS SYSTEM; SMARTPORT CT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number H787CT80STPD0
Device Problems Crack (1135); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260); Device Issue (2379)
Patient Problems Extravasation (1842); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 12/05/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the device involved in the incident is not available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for incident is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.(b)(4).Device not available for return.
 
Event Description
As reported on january 27, 2017 via a user medwatch mw5066849: port placed (b)(6) 2014, was treated with chemotherapy until 2015.The patient was restarted on chemo therapy in 2016.The port was found to be defective and replaced.The catheter was fractured.(this event is reported on medwatch 1056436-2017-00012) second port was implanted a dye study revealed a fracture in catheter.This was explanted and a new catheter was implanted.There was no report of harm or injury to the patient due to this event.It was reported the defective implantable device is not available for return to the manufacturer as it was disposed of by the user.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As the reported device was not returned, angiodynamics is unable to perform a device evaluation.The customer's reported complaint description is not confirmed, as no sample was returned for evaluation.Without receiving product for evaluation, we are unable to definitively determine a root cause for this incident.A device history review of the packaging, port assembly and catheter tubing lots revealed no quality related issues or manufacturing deficiencies at the time of manufacture.A potential root cause for the catheter fracture may be due to "pinch off syndrome".The directions for use supplied with the device instructs the physician/clinician on how to properly implant the catheter/port, and cautions against certain handling techniques to avoid "pinch-off syndrome".The instructions for use, which is supplied to the user with this catalog number, contains the following statements: potential complications: catheter fragmentation and catheter pinch-off.Catheter placement considerations: warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Pinch-off syndrome: pinch-off syndrome signs may include difficulty in aspirating blood, resistance to flushing or infusion of medications or fluids that improves with position changes, infraclavicular pain and/or swelling with catheter flushing or infusion palpitations, sudden onset chest pain, cardiac arrhythmias, extra heart sound, chest wall swelling at the port pocket, vein insertion site, pain in shoulder or port area not associated with swelling, cough, paresthesia of arm on side of catheter withdrawal occlusion or swishing sound with catheter flushing.Warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Note: if infusion or aspiration is successful upon lifting arm above the head and turning the head, consider pinch-off syndrome as a possible cause.The line should be radiologically evaluated if pinch-off syndrome is suspected.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VORTEX CT PORT ACCESS SYSTEM
Type of Device
SMARTPORT CT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS
one horizon way
manchester GA 31816
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS
one horizon way
manchester GA 31816
Manufacturer Contact
law ryan
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls, NY 12801
5187424388
MDR Report Key6325261
MDR Text Key67222821
Report Number1056436-2017-00014
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device IdentifierH787CT80STPD0
UDI-PublicH787CT80STPD0
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K062414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/13/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date08/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberH787CT80STPD0
Device Lot Number5074083
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-