(b)(4).Investigation - evaluation: a review of the drawings, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications, trends and quality control was conducted during the investigation.The customer provided a photographic image of the device showing a separation of the hub from the catheter flange.No conclusion can be drawn from this image.The complaint device was not returned therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.The lot number of the device is not known, accordingly a review of the device history record could not be conducted.Based on the information provided, no product returned and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
|