• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OPTONOL LTD. EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE; IMPLANT, EYE VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number P-50 PL
Device Problem Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/26/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: no sample was returned, therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified and visual inspection cannot be performed.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.The product was released according to manufacturer's release criteria.Because a sample was not returned, the root cause cannot be determined.The root cause will be reassessed upon completing the investigation.Additional information has been requested.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
A nurse reported occlusion of a device during a glaucoma filtering device implant procedure.The device was removed and replaced with during the same procedure.There was no patient harm.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product evaluation: the customer reported that 'the device felt occluded, it was removed and replaced during same procedure'.Sample was returned for investigation, including the shunt and the eds (separately).Some light blockages were seen in initial inner illumination.Therefore, the reported complaint was confirmed.After cleaning the shunt, openings on both sides of the restriction unit were seen with no interruptions; therefore, there is no indication for manufacturing related factors that could cause the blockage.The device history record (dhr) for the batch was reviewed.No abnormalities were found during the dhr review and the product was released according to release criteria.During production, 100% final inspection is being performed on the entire batch, including visual inspection and inner illumination.If a blockage would be noticed, the product would have been rejected immediately.Due to all of the above, one may conclude that the blockage was formed after the product left the manufacturing plant.The root cause is inconclusive ¿ no root cause identified, as the blockage could have been caused by many different reasons during and after the clinical procedure.Since openings were seen on both sides of the restriction unit, there is no indication for an inherent defect that might have caused the event.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EX-PRESS GLAUCOMA FILTRATION DEVICE
Type of Device
IMPLANT, EYE VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS  90850
Manufacturer (Section G)
OPTONOL LTD.
kiryat hatikshoret
communication center
neve-ilan 90850
IS   90850
Manufacturer Contact
rita lopez
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8175514846
MDR Report Key6336095
MDR Text Key67934873
Report Number3003701944-2017-00026
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K012852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/16/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2019
Device Model NumberP-50 PL
Device Catalogue Number40753
Device Lot Number072704
Other Device ID Number00380650704931
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/27/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/30/2017
Date Device Manufactured05/04/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-