• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-VS RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-VS RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1011344-40
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Inaccurate Delivery (2339); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/26/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The deployment issue, inaccurate delivery and resistance were not able to be confirmed as the stent was not returned.It is likely that the distal sheath was entrapped or bent within the tortuous anatomy causing the noted resistance with the slider and preventing the sheath from retracting to deploy the stent.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other similar incidents.The investigation determined that the reported difficulty was due to case circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion located in the right internal carotid artery.After predilatation, the rx.014 acculink ii 7-10/40 was advanced with anatomical resistance through the moderately calcified, heavily tortuous groin and aorta prior to successfully crossing the target lesion.During deployment of the acculink stent, it was reported that the handle slider was difficult to pull back for approximately 3/4 of the way and the tactile feel was "spongy".As a result, the deployment was aborted.When the device was removed from the anatomy, it was observed that the stent was fully deployed but only covering 2/3 of the target lesion.A non-abbott device was used to fully cover the target lesion without issue.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay in the procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-VS
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key6341683
MDR Text Key67972770
Report Number2024168-2017-01336
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier08717648076398
UDI-Public(01)08717648076398(17)180430(10)6051761
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040012
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/17/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2018
Device Catalogue Number1011344-40
Device Lot Number6051761
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/02/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EMBOLIC PROTECTION: EMBOSHIELD NAV6
Patient Age90 YR
-
-