• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL SYSTEM; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC. PORTEX® COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL SYSTEM; ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number A2693-17/27
Device Problems Product Quality Problem (1506); Failure to Deliver (2338)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/08/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Smiths medical has received the sample device.A full evaluation is anticipated, but not yet begun as the device is currently in transit to the investigation site.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a portex® combined spinal epidural system catheter did not have a hole at the tip and fluid was unable to be delivered.The issue was observed during a spinal attempt during a cesarean section procedure.The device was placed by anesthesia staff.It was observed after the epidural catheter was removed that it was not perforated at the patient end, 1cm from the catheter tip, as expected.General anesthesia was administered to address the epidural issue.The cesarean section was reported to be successful.No injury was reported.See mfr: 3012307300-2017-00634.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
One used 6ml hypodermic syringe was returned for investigation.The sample was received with a non-smiths medical device assembled to the syringe by a luer connection.The opposite end of the non-smiths medical device was assembled to a portion of the epidural catheter which was approximately 3.5" in length; this portion had been taken from the patient end.Approximately 2.5" of the catheter fragmented protruded from the non-smiths medical device.The catheter fragment was microscopically inspected and it was found that the three eyes, which are typically located at the tip of the patient end, were not present.During functional testing, attempts were made to push fluid through the assembly; however, the fluid was unable to move through.Additionally, attempts to push fluid were made using the smiths epidural connection; the fluid was unable to pass through.Investigation confirmed the reported complaint and determined that the root cause of the event was due to the catheter component which is a supplied item.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PORTEX® COMBINED SPINAL EPIDURAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA CONDUCTION KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITHS MEDICAL ASD, INC.
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITHS MEDICAL NORTH AMERICA
10 bowman drive
keene NH 03431 0724
Manufacturer Contact
lisa perz
6000 nathan lane north
minneapolis, MN 55442
7633833074
MDR Report Key6354650
MDR Text Key68208948
Report Number3012307300-2017-00483
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAZ
UDI-Device Identifier30351688058007
UDI-Public30351688058007
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K965017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/23/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2018
Device Catalogue NumberA2693-17/27
Device Lot Number3318736
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age44 YR
-
-