|
Catalog Number M0032072009250 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Death (1802); Hematoma (1884); Thrombosis (2100); Coma (2417); Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 01/24/2017 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This is the 3rd of 5 reports.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was presented in a life-threatening condition with a basilar thrombotic stroke and neurological deficit.Access to the clot was limited to the right vertebral artery (va) that presented a critical stenosis of the va-distal v4 segment.Left vertebral artery was occluded and not accessible.Angioplasty with the subject balloon catheter of the stenosis of va-v4 segment led to dissection resulting in hematoma and occlusion.Medical intervention in order to restore blood flow through the occluded va- v4 segment by angioplasty was performed without success.Then, stenting of the va-v4 segment with a first stent was performed.However, the distal stent tines did not open properly even with additional angioplasty procedure.Blood flow was not restored.A second stent was attempted to be implanted but could not be deployed beyond the poorly opened distal tines of the first deployed stent.A third stent was deployed more distally in the basilar artery and overlapping the original stent.The stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.Blood flow was not restored and injection of platelet aggregation inhibitor into the occluded vessel as well as additional angioplasty was performed.The stent tines and the stents were eventually correctly opened but blood flow was not restored.The physician reported that he would have strongly preferred to use a different size balloon catheter but due to the emergency nature of the procedure, a more appropriately sized balloon was not available.Two days post procedure, the patient was determined to be in "coma" and pronounced dead shortly after.In the physician¿s opinion, ¿the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record (dhr) review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The subject device was not returned for analysis; therefore, physical as well as a functional testing could not be performed.However, dissection, patient outcome of death, patient hematoma, patient complications, patient thrombosis are known risks associated with endovascular procedures and noted as such in the device directions for use (dfu).Therefore, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication was assigned to this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was presented in a life-threatening condition with a basilar thrombotic stroke and neurological deficit.Access to the clot was limited to the right vertebral artery (va) that presented a critical stenosis of the va-distal v4 segment.Left vertebral artery was occluded and not accessible.Angioplasty with the subject balloon catheter of the stenosis of va-v4 segment led to dissection resulting in hematoma and occlusion.Medical intervention in order to restore blood flow through the occluded va- v4 segment by angioplasty was performed without success.Then, stenting of the va-v4 segment with a first stent was performed.However, the distal stent tines did not open properly even with additional angioplasty procedure.Blood flow was not restored.A second stent was attempted to be implanted but could not be deployed beyond the poorly opened distal tines of the first deployed stent.A third stent was deployed more distally in the basilar artery and overlapping the original stent.The stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.Blood flow was not restored and injection of platelet aggregation inhibitor into the occluded vessel as well as additional angioplasty was performed.The stent tines and the stents were eventually correctly opened but blood flow was not restored.The physician reported that he would have strongly preferred to use a different size balloon catheter but due to the emergency nature of the procedure, a more appropriately sized balloon was not available.Two days post procedure, the patient was determined to be in "coma" and pronounced dead shortly after.In the physician¿s opinion, ¿the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices¿.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record (dhr) review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The subject device was not returned for analysis; therefore, physical as well as a functional testing could not be performed.However, dissection, patient outcome of death, patient complications, patient thrombosis are known risks associated with endovascular procedures and noted as such in the device directions for use (dfu).Therefore, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication was assigned to this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient was presented in a life-threatening condition with a basilar thrombotic stroke and neurological deficit.Access to the clot was limited to the right vertebral artery (va) that presented a critical stenosis of the va-distal v4 segment.Left vertebral artery was occluded and not accessible.Angioplasty with the subject balloon catheter of the stenosis of va-v4 segment led to dissection resulting in hematoma and occlusion.Medical intervention in order to restore blood flow through the occluded va- v4 segment by angioplasty was performed without success.Then, stenting of the va-v4 segment with a first stent was performed.However, the distal stent tines did not open properly even with additional angioplasty procedure.Blood flow was not restored.A second stent was attempted to be implanted but could not be deployed beyond the poorly opened distal tines of the first deployed stent.A third stent was deployed more distally in the basilar artery and overlapping the original stent.The stent was only placed with great difficulty through the first stent.There was some bending of the hypotube but it did not render the stent unusable.Blood flow was not restored and injection of platelet aggregation inhibitor into the occluded vessel as well as additional angioplasty was performed.The stent tines and the stents were eventually correctly opened but blood flow was not restored.The physician reported that he would have strongly preferred to use a different size balloon catheter but due to the emergency nature of the procedure, a more appropriately sized balloon was not available.Two days post procedure, the patient was determined to be in "coma" and pronounced dead shortly after.In the physician¿s opinion, ¿the outcome prognosis without the intervention was poor, with death as a possibility.The procedure did not help the patient and may have made him worse.The patient's death is not specifically related to any of the devices¿.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|