• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Failure to Interrogate (1332); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Low Battery (2584); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Date 09/30/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer's representative via a consumer regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for the treatment of spinal pain.It was reported that the patient's device had entered over discharge.The patient reports that they charged the battery every other day and that the last time stimulation was felt was on wednesday (b)(6).The patient is unable to get signal with recharger or 8840.The patient had a physician mode recharge (pmr) in (b)(6).The representative initiated a pmr, and the patient refused to stay for the duration of the trickle charge.The patient was urged to continue the charge as another pmr would cause the need for a battery replacement.No further information at this time.The device was returned to the manufacturer on 2017-02-17.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (s/n (b)(4)) found no significant anomaly.The implant had reduced capacity due to overdischarge.The ins was received with no telemetry and no output from any electrode pair.Telemetry was restored after a full physician mode recharge.After telemetry was restored and a full normal recharge, the ins passed functional testing.According to the trace report taken from the ins, the last recharge while implanted took place on (b)(6) 2000 and the battery was charged to 3.080 volts.On (b)(6) 2016 the battery had depleted to the "lock" mode (<(><<)>(><(><<)><(><<)>)>3.575 volts).Subsequently, the battery depleted to an over discharged state prior to being received for analysis.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6357208
MDR Text Key68284690
Report Number3004209178-2017-04559
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/28/2016
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/06/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-