• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TITAN SPINE, LLC ENDOSKELETON® TAS NANOLOCK SURFACE TECHNOLOGY; 12 DEG LORDOTIC, IMPLANT, STANDARD, 12MM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TITAN SPINE, LLC ENDOSKELETON® TAS NANOLOCK SURFACE TECHNOLOGY; 12 DEG LORDOTIC, IMPLANT, STANDARD, 12MM Back to Search Results
Model Number 2312-0112-N
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Injury (2348)
Event Date 01/03/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The endoskeleton® tas bone screw, 2300-5530 (v13) is jammed through the endoskeleton® tas implant's cage window, 2312-0112-n (tm0008001).The bone screw is unable to be separated from implant with use of normal instrumentation.The bone screw has damaged threading which likely resulted from the bone screw incorrectly being inserted through the implant's cage window.The bone screw's hex has damage and appears to be stripped.This damaged could have been caused by the screw being incorrectly forced into position or while attempting to back the screw out.The implant has damage at the bone screw insertion holes and the implant's cage window.The implant has been deformed in these areas reasonably caused by a bone screw being forced into an incorrect position.Images of the corresponding damaged and jammed tas bone screw and implant are attached.Endoskeleton® tas surgical technique provides instructions for the proper placement of bone screws with tas implants.X-rays should be used to confirm the desired trajectories of the bone screws.If surgeon used x-rays to confirm the trajectory of bone screw in this case, surgeon would have been able to identify the incorrect trajectory of the bone screw prior to driving the screw into the jammed position within the implant.A review of the products device history record was performed for subject devices.The review revealed there were no anomalies or non-conformances generated during the manufacture of these devices that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was found to be within specification during inspection.
 
Event Description
During a scoli deformity correction the surgeon was doing an alif l4/l5 procedure, somehow drove the screw through the back of the implant and were not able to back the screw out.Surgeon attempted to back out the cage with the screw in place.During the process something vascular was nicked, the vascular surgeon clamped the vessel and was able to stop the bleeding.Surgeon was able to put in another cage and complete the procedure.The vascular surgeon closed the patient and the surgery was completed.
 
Event Description
During a scoli deformity correction the surgeon was doing an alif l4/l5 procedure, somehow drove the screw through the back of the implant and were not able to back the screw out.Surgeon attempted to back out the cage with the screw in place.During the process something vascular was nicked, the vascular surgeon clamped the vessel and was able to stop the bleeding.Surgeon was able to put in another cage and complete the procedure.The vascular surgeon closed the patient and the surgery was completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The endoskeleton® tas bone screw, 2300-5530 (v13) is jammed through the endoskeleton® tas implant's cage window, 2312-0112-n (tm0008001).The bone screw is unable to be separated from implant with use of normal instrumentation.The bone screw has damaged threading which likely resulted from the bone screw incorrectly being inserted through the implant's cage window.The bone screw's hex has damage and appears to be stripped.This damaged could have been caused by the screw being incorrectly forced into position or while attempting to back the screw out.The implant has damage at the bone screw insertion holes and the implant's cage window.The implant has been deformed in these areas reasonably caused by a bone screw being forced into an incorrect position.Images of the corresponding damaged and jammed tas bone screw and implant are attached.Endoskeleton® tas surgical technique provides instructions for the proper placement of bone screws with tas implants.X-rays should be used to confirm the desired trajectories of the bone screws.If surgeon used x-rays to confirm the trajectory of bone screw in this case, surgeon would have been able to identify the incorrect trajectory of the bone screw prior to driving the screw into the jammed position within the implant.A review of the products device history record was performed for subject devices.The review revealed there were no anomalies or non-conformances generated during the manufacture of these devices that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was found to be within specification during inspection.-.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOSKELETON® TAS NANOLOCK SURFACE TECHNOLOGY
Type of Device
12 DEG LORDOTIC, IMPLANT, STANDARD, 12MM
Manufacturer (Section D)
TITAN SPINE, LLC
6140 w. executive dr. ste a
mequon WI 53092
MDR Report Key6358609
MDR Text Key68356247
Report Number3006340236-2017-00002
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OVD
UDI-Device IdentifierM68223120112N0
UDI-Public+M68223120112N0/$$3210105TM0008001/16D201607070
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K141953
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date01/05/2021
Device Model Number2312-0112-N
Device Catalogue Number2312-0112-N
Device Lot NumberTM0008001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/13/2017
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/25/2017
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-