• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS MEDIUM, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS MEDIUM, RIGHT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400256
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 02/03/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.The reported device was manufactured and distributed by (b)(4) and implanted prior to howmedica osteonics corp.¿s purchase of certain assets of (b)(4) on august 1, 2014.Stryker became legal manufacturer of this product on april 1, 2015 and has taken the responsibility for medical device reporting.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a poly dislocated posterior.Revision scheduled on (b)(6) 2017.Sales rep reported that "the talar comp was replaced and moved more posterior & the poly was replaced with an 8mm.Activity of patient: low.Bone quality: fair.Evidence of inflammation/infection/tissue damage: no surgical site description: appeared fine.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation revealed the sliding core, the tibial component and the talar component to be the subject products.No further associated products were reported.A review of the device history records revealed no discrepancies.Deficiency in material or manufacturing was not found.The affected implants were documented as faultless prior to distribution.Thus, we excluded deviations in material and manufacturing.In the case presented a patient had been treated with star on (b)(6) 2016 due to an arthritis of the right ankle.On (b)(6) 2017, 8 weeks after the implantation, the patient had to be revised as the polyethylene component was found to be dislocated posteriorly.The sliding core was removed and replaced by an 8 mm one.The talar component was replaced as well and positioned more posteriorly.The sliding core was examined macroscopically for signs of wear, iatrogenic damage and fracture.The damage modes of pitting and scratching were observed on the superior surface.Overall the received polyethylene sliding core was found to be in a very good condition.The talar component showed signs of use and implantation in the form of scratches, but no significant damage.Potential evidence of metal-on-metal impingement was identified on the talar component.The tibial component could not be examined as it stayed implanted.As no x-rays, medical records and operation reports were available, a medical review was not possible.It could not be determined whether the implants had been placed according to the anatomical requirements.It could furthermore not be determined if the components had been implanted in the correct positions.It could also not be determined if the patient conditions were adequate for the used implant respectively if any potential adverse effects may have contributed to the dislocation experienced.Based on the available information a deficiency of the devices in question could not be verified.The exact root cause of the dislocation could not be determined.In case any relevant clinical information should become available, we reserve the right to update the investigation and change the root cause.Review of complaint history, capa databases and risk analysis did not identify any discrepancies.There are no open actions in place related to the reported event for the subject product.No non-conformity was identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a poly dislocated posterior.Revision scheduled on (b)(6) 2017.Sales rep reported that "the talar comp was replaced and moved more posterior & the poly was replaced with an 8mm.Activity of patient: low.Bone quality: fair.Evidence of inflammation/infection/tissue damage: no surgical site description: appeared fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TALAR COMP,SINGLE COATED US VERS MEDIUM, RIGHT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, UNICOMPARTMENTAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYME
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
CH   2545
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6366751
MDR Text Key68597639
Report Number0008031020-2017-00092
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NTG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number400256
Device Lot Number130415/0788
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient Weight111
-
-