• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS PICC; PERCUTANEOUS IMPLANTED LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS PICC; PERCUTANEOUS IMPLANTED LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the report that the purple luer connector had been pulled from the extension leg was confirmed as use related.A d/l powerpicc was received without the purple luer connector.The extension leg that was missing the luer connector was tied in a knot.The printing was completely worn from the extension leg that was missing the luer connector and partially worn from the extension leg with the red connector.Both clamps were present on the extension legs.Impressions from clamping and/or kinking were observed in the damaged extension leg.What appears to be residual adhesive from a dressing was visible on the external surface of the extension legs.The damaged extension leg extended 7.7 cm from the proximal end of the bifurcation, which indicates that the tubing broke within the hub.The d/l tubing extended 39.2 cm from the distal end of the bifurcation.A microscopic examination of the proximal end of the damaged extension leg revealed that the cross section was rough and jagged around a portion of the perimeter, which is indicative of a break or tear in the material.A functional test revealed that both lumens were patent to infusion and no leaks were observed.Due to the condition of the catheter, it appears that the tear in the extension leg tubing occurred during use.Potential contributors to the damage include excessive stress in the material from pulling, twisting, bending, and or clamping near the luer connector.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
Per sales representative, facility reported that the hub had been pulled off the lumen.He stated that the lumen looked torn, but that the picc was okay, it was still under the dressing.He stated that it also looked like the lumen had been clamped.No patient harm reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PICC
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS IMPLANTED LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
teresa johnson
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225435
MDR Report Key6372337
MDR Text Key69209801
Report Number3006260740-2017-00174
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/13/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received02/13/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-