The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the report that the purple luer connector had been pulled from the extension leg was confirmed as use related.A d/l powerpicc was received without the purple luer connector.The extension leg that was missing the luer connector was tied in a knot.The printing was completely worn from the extension leg that was missing the luer connector and partially worn from the extension leg with the red connector.Both clamps were present on the extension legs.Impressions from clamping and/or kinking were observed in the damaged extension leg.What appears to be residual adhesive from a dressing was visible on the external surface of the extension legs.The damaged extension leg extended 7.7 cm from the proximal end of the bifurcation, which indicates that the tubing broke within the hub.The d/l tubing extended 39.2 cm from the distal end of the bifurcation.A microscopic examination of the proximal end of the damaged extension leg revealed that the cross section was rough and jagged around a portion of the perimeter, which is indicative of a break or tear in the material.A functional test revealed that both lumens were patent to infusion and no leaks were observed.Due to the condition of the catheter, it appears that the tear in the extension leg tubing occurred during use.Potential contributors to the damage include excessive stress in the material from pulling, twisting, bending, and or clamping near the luer connector.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
Per sales representative, facility reported that the hub had been pulled off the lumen.He stated that the lumen looked torn, but that the picc was okay, it was still under the dressing.He stated that it also looked like the lumen had been clamped.No patient harm reported.
|