• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC ALEVE DIRECT THERAPY TENS; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR (TENS)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC ALEVE DIRECT THERAPY TENS; TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR (TENS) Back to Search Results
Lot Number 612005
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Swelling (2091)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer (subsequently medically confirmed) and describes the occurrence of burn infection ("i got a burn on my back / the burn got infected") in a (b)(6)-year-old female patient who received aleve tens device direct therapy unit (batch no.T05whv) for low back pain.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On an unknown date, the patient started aleve tens device direct therapy unit.In (b)(6) 2016, the patient experienced medical device site scab ("it started as a hard scab").On (b)(6)2016, the patient experienced burn infection (seriousness criteria medically significant and clinically significant/intervention required) and medical device site swelling ("my back swelled").In (b)(6) 2016, the patient experienced wound secretion ("the burn infected is still oozing").The patient was treated with bactrim (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) and antibiotics.Aleve tens device direct therapy unit was withdrawn.In 2016, the medical device site scab had resolved.In (b)(6) 2016, the medical device site swelling had resolved.At the time of the report, the burn infection and wound secretion had resolved.The reporter provided no causality assessment for burn infection, wound secretion and medical device site swelling with aleve tens device direct therapy unit.The reporter considered medical device site scab to be related to aleve tens device direct therapy unit.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: the reported defect cannot be confirmed at this time.An investigation report has been requested of the cmo and additional time is needed identify the cause.A follow up has been created where the conclusive assessment will be finalized upon receipt.This procedure is in alignment with the current version of gsop 115.Product technical complaint occurred: aleve tens - electrical problems.(b)(4).Investigation reviewed.The ptc investigation was initiated and the outcome of the investigation resulted in an unconfirmed quality defect.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 22-feb-2017: correction: the seriousness criterion of intervention required was added.Company causality comment this spontaneous case reported by a consumer described the occurrence of a burn infection ("i got a burn on my back / the burn got infected") in a (b)(6) year-old female patient who received aleve tens device direct therapy unit for low back pain.This event is serious due to medical importance and intervention required and unlisted in the reference safety information for aleve tens.No other consumer`s concurrent conditions and medical history were reported.Consumer reported that the event started as a hard scab and consumer thought it would go away, but it had gotten very infected.Consumer`s doctor referred her to a surgeon and she had the burn lanced.She took antibiotics for treatment and event recovered.In this context, considering the close temporal relationship and the lack of alternative explanation for event, causality of aleve tens cannot be excluded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer (subsequently medically confirmed) and describes the occurrence of burn infection ("i got a burn on my back / the burn got infected") in a (b)(6) year-old female patient who received aleve tens device direct therapy unit (batch no.612005) for low back pain.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.In (b)(6) 2016, 7 days before starting aleve tens device direct therapy unit, the patient experienced medical device site scab ("it started as a hard scab").On an unknown date, the patient started aleve tens device direct therapy unit.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient experienced burn infection (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and medical device site swelling ("my back swelled").In (b)(6) 2016, the patient experienced wound secretion ("the burn infected is still oozing").The patient was treated with bactrim (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim) and antibiotics.Aleve tens device direct therapy unit was withdrawn.In 2016, the medical device site scab had resolved.In (b)(6) 2016, the medical device site swelling had resolved.At the time of the report, the burn infection and wound secretion had resolved.The reporter provided no causality assessment for burn infection, medical device site swelling and wound secretion with aleve tens device direct therapy unit.The reporter considered medical device site scab to be related to aleve tens device direct therapy unit.Diagnostic results (normal ranges are provided in parenthesis if available): body mass index was 26.8 kg/sqm.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: based on the technical investigation on the tens direct therapy, electrical evaluation of the returned sample was unable to confirm any failure modes related to the reported condition.Aleve direct therapy tens units are made in accordance with current good manufacturing practices and to the applicable fda and iso regulations.All products undergoes 100% inspection and 100% functional testing at multiple points throughout the manufacturing process where the associated data and documentation is reviewed to ensure all released product meets product specifications.Since a root cause for the reported condition cannot be identified, corrective action will be limited to the manufacturing awareness.No further corrective action is required at this time.This issue will be monitored and trended to potentially identify new failure modes.Based on the technical investigation on the gel pads, no samples were returned therefore, the product analysis could not be performed and unable to confirm the issue of the reported condition.The device history record (dhr) review showed that all acceptance criteria inspections per established sampling levels were within acceptable limits during the production process.The probable root cause is due to not placing the electrode evenly on the skin or when there is inadequate skin preparation.It is important that proper customer preparation techniques be completed which specify wash the skin and dry completely.Some of the contributing factors is not properly storing the gel pads, customer skin types, oils, and ph levels can impact the usage of the pads 2-5 applications.Due to that fact that no sample was provided, a root cause for the reported condition cannot be specifically identified.Therefore, corrective action will be limited to the manufacturing awareness.The ptc investigation was conducted and the outcome of the investigation resulted in an unconfirmed quality defect.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 17-oct-2017: results of quality-safety evaluation of ptc were updated.Product lot number was updated.This spontaneous case reported by a consumer described the occurrence of a burn infection ("i got a burn on my back / the burn got infected") in a (b)(6) year-old female patient who received aleve tens device direct therapy unit for low back pain.This event is serious due to medical importance and intervention required and unlisted in the reference safety information for aleve tens.No other consumer`s concurrent conditions and medical history were reported.Consumer reported that the event started as a hard scab and consumer thought it would go away, but it had gotten very infected.Consumer`s doctor referred her to a surgeon and she had the burn lanced.She took antibiotics for treatment and event recovered.In this context, considering the close temporal relationship and the lack of alternative explanation for event, causality of aleve tens cannot be excluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALEVE DIRECT THERAPY TENS
Type of Device
TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR (TENS)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC
3030 jackson avenue
memphis TN 38151
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC
3030 jackson avenue
memphis TN 38151
Manufacturer Contact
k. shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd, p o box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key6373336
MDR Text Key68964773
Report Number1020060-2017-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NUH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K152852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Lot Number612005
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/19/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age76 YR
Patient Weight64
-
-